LegalNewsLine Logo  
Friday, February 3 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Idaho AG settles AWP case
+ Feds collect fine from GM for Superfund cleanup
+ Md. high court: Allergy is a handicap
+ Workers rights group seeks to disqualify NLRB appointee
+ U.S. AG details goals of new mortgage crisis unit
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
State Supreme Courts 
story date  
Woman goes 0-for-2 with her lawsuits
RIJudicial.jpg
PROVIDENCE, R.I. -- Rhode Island's Supreme Court recently upheld a Superior Court decision that a Providence law firm wasn't to blame for a woman losing her medical malpractice case.

The order, released Monday, says Lois Gullage did not adequately prove her pro se case against Bowerman and Taylor Guertin.

She alleged that the firm did not return her x-rays, which prevented her from acquiring an expert witness for her medical malpractice case against Rhode Island Hospital. Bowerman and Taylor Guertin represented the hospital in the case, which was dismissed because she did not have an expert witness -- a necessity in a med mal case.

Rhode Island Hospital was granted summary judgment on Oct. 26, 2004, and the case against Bowerman and Taylor Guertin was filed the same day.

"Irrespective of the timing of the defendant's possession of the x-rays in question, the failure to either return them to the plaintiff or to inform her that it had returned them to (MGH Image Service Center) does not provide the plaintiff with a recognizable cause of action," the order says.

Gullage had requested the x-rays on Sept. 4, 2004. A letter from MGH said they were not located in the proper folder as of Nov. 18, 2004.

The firm was able to produce a letter of return dated Oct. 8, 2004, and a canceled check date June 6, 2004, seven months before MGH claimed they had not received payment.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Pa. SC won't meddle with Philly forum-shopping - 2/2   read more
+ D.C. high court tackles government contacts principle - 2/2   read more
+ Conn. SC: Physician's opinion in med mal case detailed enough - 2/1   read more
+ Ark. SC rules clerk's signature on summons was valid - 2/1   read more
+ Miss. SC reverses part of decision in underwriting case - 2/1   read more
+ Mo. SC upholds cap on punitive damages - 1/31   read more
+ Del. SC says firm's fee must be deducted before lien - 1/31   read more
+ Md. high court: Allergy is a handicap - 1/31   read more
+ Mich. SC: Judge fixed traffic tickets - 1/31   read more
+ Ark. SC dismisses state lottery appeal over trademarks - 1/27   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
williamsmichael.jpg
Friday, February 03, 2012
NEW YORK (Legal Newsline) - Summaries of 24 mortgage loans paint a heart-breaking picture of routine dishonesty that brought down America's house of cards.
Read more...


+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
+ Philly again the biggest 'Judicial Hellhole' - 12/14
+ Reverse bifurcation suspended in Philly mass torts - 12/9
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.