LegalNewsLine Logo  
Friday, February 10 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
+ Real estate agent, mortgage broker found guilty of fraud
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
State Supreme Courts 
story date  
Med-mal cap survives constitutional challenge in SC
LouisianaSuprCtBldg.peg.jpeg
BATON ROUGE -- The limit on Louisiana's medical malpractice lawsuit payouts is still $500,000 following a recent state Supreme Court decision.

The Supreme Court this week sent back to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals a ruling that declared the cap unconstitutional. The cap, established in 1975, has been unpopular with consumer advocates, who say malpractice insurance costs have risen regardless of the cap.

The Appeals Court ruled the cap "unconstitutional because it no longer provided an adequate remedy to victims of malpractice." The court stated that the cap should be raised to $1.7 million to correct for inflation.

But "adequate remedy" was not at issue in the original case and so could not be the basis of the appellate court's finding, the Supreme Court ruled.

Sending the case back to the Appeals Court could mean a wait of a year or two before the matter of whether the cap is constitutional or not is finally decided. Insurers greeted the news of a reprieve on the cap with relief.

Louisiana's largest med-mal insurer, Lammico, was happy with the Supreme Court decision but "we don't really know what's going to happen," admitted company representative Sue Chopin.

Other supporters of the cap say tossing it would increase insurance premiums, raise health-care costs and force doctors out of the state.


Filed Under: State Supreme Courts

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ S.C. chief justice says courts essential to economic development - 2/9   read more
+ Pa. SC won't meddle with Philly forum-shopping - 2/2   read more
+ D.C. high court tackles government contacts principle - 2/2   read more
+ Conn. SC: Physician's opinion in med mal case detailed enough - 2/1   read more
+ Ark. SC rules clerk's signature on summons was valid - 2/1   read more
+ Miss. SC reverses part of decision in underwriting case - 2/1   read more
+ Mo. SC upholds cap on punitive damages - 1/31   read more
+ Del. SC says firm's fee must be deducted before lien - 1/31   read more
+ Md. high court: Allergy is a handicap - 1/31   read more
+ Mich. SC: Judge fixed traffic tickets - 1/31   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.