LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, March 21 2010     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Settlement reached over nutritional supplement enrollment plan‏
+ AG Tom Miller lands in GOP crosshairs
+ Whitman leads Brown in latest poll
+ Brown gets polluting hair products taken off store shelves
+ Texas medical malpractice law survives challenge
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Bankruptcy
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Financial Crisis
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
U.S. Supreme Court 
 
Tobacco giant picks up second big win as USSC boots suit
United States Supreme Court building
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Philip Morris finally appears to have cleared the tobacco-lawsuit decks.

As predicted several months ago, the U.S. Supreme Court today threw out one of the last remaining state-based lawsuits against cigarette-maker Philip Morris and parent company Altria.

It wasn't exactly on the grounds that the company had been seeking. But it was still Philip Morris's second major win at the U.S. Supreme Court in less than three months.

In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled that the original $79.5 million in punitive damages awarded to an Oregon widow in the so-called Williams case could not stand. The court ruled that the jury had not been given adequate instructions about awarding such damages.

Authoring justice Stephen Breyer said state courts must guard against juries "seeking, not simply to determine reprehensibility, but also to punish for harm caused strangers."

Breyer said jurors can punish "reprehensible conduct that causes harm to many" but may not calculate this harm to justify major damages. Apparently some dissenting justices failed to appreciate this distinction, according to David Savage of the LA Times.

Joining Breyer in the majority were Justices Roberts, Alito, Souter and Kennedy. Two of the court's liberals - Ruth Bader Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens - and two of its most conservative members - Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas - dissented.

Philip Morris originally appealed the case not on the basis of jury instruction but because of the punitive damages allowed by the Oregon Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled three years ago that punitive damages exceeding the personal award by more than ten times may be unconstitutional.

The widow in the Williams case originally received personal damages of $821,000, about one ninety-seventh of the punitive damages award of $79.5 million.

This Supreme Court victory for Philip Morris comes less than three months after its last major win on the tobacco-suit front. That decision left intact an Illinois Supreme Court ruling that tossed Madison County's $10.1 billion punitive damages award against Philip Morris over the marketing of "light" cigarettes.

Legal observers say tobacco companies' recent wins are part of a shift in the U.S. over recent years away from large civil and class-action lawsuits. They say federal and state tort reforms over that time have helped stem the tide.


Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Carp crisis discussed at justices' weekly meeting - 3/19  
+ Justice Stevens mulls retirement - 3/16  
+ High court to decide if vaccine makers can be sued - 3/8  
+ Court ends long-running Cisco lawsuit - 2/26  
+ U.S. justices rule in closely watched civil jurisdiction case - 2/23  
+ U.S. high court allows $600 million class action against bond hou... - 2/23  
+ Tobacco companies seek Supreme Court review of racketeering verdi... - 2/22  
+ Legislation introduced in response to U.S. SC decision - 2/11  
+ Souter to address Harvard graduates - 2/9  
+ Delaware asks U.S. SC to hear sports-betting appeal - 1/28  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Most of the judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals get a failing grade when it comes to the "expansion of liability," according to a judicial evaluation report.
Read more...


+ 'Land of Enchantment' in 'Hellhole': Tort reform group calls New Mexico's appeals court 'pro-liability' - 3/2
+ Group puts the brakes on Honda class action settlement - 2/23
+ AG Brown, feds sitting out whisteblower suit against pipemaker - 2/18
+ Calif. AG hopeful vows to target public employee pension increases - 2/12
+ Nebraska AG Bruning's political star rising - 2/5
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ Abbott: Beware Dietary Supplement Scams and 'Miracle' Health Claims
+ Abbott's signs of a scam
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.