LegalNewsLine Logo  
Saturday, July 4 2009     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ U.S. Supreme Court sides with white firefighters in race bias case
+ U.S. Supreme Court: State AGs may probe national lending practices
+ King: Rethink GM bankruptcy plan
+ McKenna argues against federal preemption of consumer laws
+ Obama says Supreme Court 'moving the ball' on affirmative action
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Bankruptcy
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Financial Crisis
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
State Supreme Courts 
 
Supreme Court dissenters hail attorney suspended for fee breaches
Justice Richard B. Sanders
OLYMPIA -- A trial lawyer suspended today by the Washington Supreme Court for dishonestly billing his clients should instead be commended, claims a dissenting judge.

Justice Richard B. Sanders says attorney Bradley Marshall committed no ethical breaches despite today's six-judge majority ruling in the Supreme Court review case In re: Discipline of Marshall (docket# 200,302-8).

Marshall had represented a group of longshoremen in a civil rights lawsuit against the International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union. He won the plaintiffs an $800,000 settlement in the suit.

The Supreme Court's opinion today agreed with most charges leveled against Marshall by the Washington State Bar Association and its Discplinary Board, which had recommended disbarment. The case was brought by the original plaintiffs in the longshoremen case.

But the Supreme Court, on appeal, reduced Marshall punishment to 18 months suspension because of a disputed fee-splitting charge.

The Supreme Court ruled Marshall "acted dishonestly" for requesting fake invoices "to hide a fee arranagement that appeared to be fee-splitting" and kept several thousand dollars in "improperly overcharged costs," wrote Bobbe J. Bridge.

Sanders' dissent notes that both the Bar and the Court referred to Marshall's "potential conflict" in that case. Yet neither ruling "explain[s] where this mysterious, amorphous conflict lies," he notes.

"What Marshall did was successfully settle his clients' civil rights claims, earning them nearly a million dollars." Sanders wrote, joined in dissent by Associate Chief Justice Charles W. Johnson. "Rather than punish him, we should commend him."

Justice Bridge was joined in the majority decision by Chief Justice Gerry Alexander and Justices Tom Chambers, Susan Owen, Barbara A. Madsen and James M. Johnson.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Ohio justices to hear satellite TV tax case - 7/1  
+ Minn. Supreme Court: Al Franken won Minnesota Senate race - 7/1  
+ Nevada SC approves rules for new foreclosure mediation program - 6/30  
+ N.J. Senate gives justice tenure - 6/29  
+ Civil justice group says 'right decision, wrong author' in court'... - 6/24  
+ Arizona Supreme Court sidesteps budget battle - 6/24  
+ Justice Albin one step closer to tenure - 6/23  
+ Sheetz unhappy with Pa. SC decision - 6/16  
+ Utah SC hears DRAM price-fixing case - 6/13  
+ Calif. court: Businesses may be sued for unintentional ADA violat... - 6/12  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Monday, June 29, 2009
WASHNGTON (Legal Newsline) - The federal government plans to withhold nearly a half-million dollars the next time it doles out Medicaid funding to the State of West Virginia as a result of a settlement engineered by state Attorney General Darrell McGraw.
Read more...


+ The Libby verdict: Did the judge play favorites? - 6/2
+ Sotomayor can expect plenty of scrutiny - 5/26
+ The Libby verdict: Prosecutors make a fatal mistake - 5/21
+ California judge accuses asbestos firms of playing 'grisly games' - 5/5
+ GOP calls for outside counsel reform in wake of Rendell controversy - 4/23
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ Abbott: Beware Dietary Supplement Scams and 'Miracle' Health Claims
+ Abbott's signs of a scam
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.