LegalNewsLine Logo  
Saturday, February 11 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
story date  
City of Milwaukee loses lead paint case
MILWAUKEE, Wis. - The former manufacturers of lead paint can continue celebrating as they claimed yet another victory Friday in the ongoing saga of public nuisance lawsuits filed against them.

A Milwaukee jury decided that NL Industries was responsible for creating a public nuisance by manufacturing lead-based paint, found to be toxic and outlawed in 1978, but added that the company did not intentionally create the nuisance.

"The vast majority of property owners in the City of Milwaukee are responsible and maintain their properties," said Don Scott, trial counsel for NL Industries. "But a small number of landlords do not maintain their properties in a safe manner.

"Litigation is a distraction from the proven solution of enforcing the law against landlords who neglect their property."

A 10-2 vote got NL Industries off the hook for the $52.6 million the City sought. The case was heard in the Milwaukee County Circuit Court.

Last week, paint manufacturers picked up wins in Missouri's and New Jersey's supreme courts. Cases are still pending in Rhode Island -- where the state has been very successful -- and Ohio.

Critics say public nuisance claims are a way around the shortcomings of a products liability case, like the now expired statute of limitations. Lead paint was outlawed in 1978, and companies stopped manufacturing it.

Plaintiffs firm Motley Rice is credited with the idea of using a public nuisance claim to sue paint companies
and is representing several of the municipalities, counties and states attempting to do so.

The jury in Milwaukee also voted 10-2 that the company created a public nuisance. After some confusion, Judge John Franke ordered it to reconvene because the same 10 jurors who voted that way needed to be the same 10 who voted that NL Industries did not intentionally create the nuisance.

"The City of Milwaukee should intensify its efforts to hold landlords accountable. It is not good public policy for the city to deflect responsibility in enforcing these laws, especially when lead-based paint is a product that was legal and specified by governments at the time, including Milwaukee," Scott said.


Filed Under: Hot Topics

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ U.S. SC mulling Calif. contingency fee suit - 12/28   read more
+ Coakley files suit over housing practices - 12/27   read more
+ R.I. SC could force State to pay up - 7/19   read more
+ Sherwin-Williams makes case against $7M verdict - 7/6   read more
+ Rhode Island not ordered to pay up in failed lead paint suit - 5/26   read more
+ Arguments set for contingency fee dispute in California - 3/31   read more
+ Sorrell sends lead letters to landlords - 1/25   read more
+ Annual lead paint report released - 12/21   read more
+ Sherwin-Williams appeals $7M Miss. verdict - 11/13   read more
+ Vermont landlord to pay for violations of state lead law - 11/11   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.