LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, September 7 2008     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ August not a good month for Internet travel company
+ Washington court rules against arbitration clause
+ Brown joins fight over Orange County deputies' pensions
+ Ohio AG partners with FBI on raid on pharmacy
+ Door-to-door sales company settles with Calif. again
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
+ Tort Reform
Lead Paint 
 
City of Milwaukee loses lead paint case
MILWAUKEE, Wis. - The former manufacturers of lead paint can continue celebrating as they claimed yet another victory Friday in the ongoing saga of public nuisance lawsuits filed against them.

A Milwaukee jury decided that NL Industries was responsible for creating a public nuisance by manufacturing lead-based paint, found to be toxic and outlawed in 1978, but added that the company did not intentionally create the nuisance.

"The vast majority of property owners in the City of Milwaukee are responsible and maintain their properties," said Don Scott, trial counsel for NL Industries. "But a small number of landlords do not maintain their properties in a safe manner.

"Litigation is a distraction from the proven solution of enforcing the law against landlords who neglect their property."

A 10-2 vote got NL Industries off the hook for the $52.6 million the City sought. The case was heard in the Milwaukee County Circuit Court.

Last week, paint manufacturers picked up wins in Missouri's and New Jersey's supreme courts. Cases are still pending in Rhode Island -- where the state has been very successful -- and Ohio.

Critics say public nuisance claims are a way around the shortcomings of a products liability case, like the now expired statute of limitations. Lead paint was outlawed in 1978, and companies stopped manufacturing it.

Plaintiffs firm Motley Rice is credited with the idea of using a public nuisance claim to sue paint companies
and is representing several of the municipalities, counties and states attempting to do so.

The jury in Milwaukee also voted 10-2 that the company created a public nuisance. After some confusion, Judge John Franke ordered it to reconvene because the same 10 jurors who voted that way needed to be the same 10 who voted that NL Industries did not intentionally create the nuisance.

"The City of Milwaukee should intensify its efforts to hold landlords accountable. It is not good public policy for the city to deflect responsibility in enforcing these laws, especially when lead-based paint is a product that was legal and specified by governments at the time, including Milwaukee," Scott said.


Filed Under: Hot Topics


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Motley Rice gripe appears in Providence paper - 8/19  
+ DuPont paying up in Rhode Island lead paint case - 8/18  
+ Lead the reason landlord wouldn't rent to family, Coakley claims - 8/12  
+ Court costs debated in landmark lead paint suit - 8/8  
+ Paint industry's appeal of contingent fee contract will be heard ... - 7/24  
+ Another paint suit brushed away - 7/9  
+ Money matters may not be settled in lead paint case - 7/1  
+ Lynch lashes out at Court over lead paint decision - 7/1  
+ On biggest battleground, public nuisance beaten back - 7/1  
+ Defendants prevail in historic R.I. lawsuit - 7/1  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Friday, August 29, 2008
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (Legal Newsline) - When House Bill 104 passed during the first Special Session of this year's state Legislature, it did so with little fanfare. Yet it represents to date the single act of oversight the Legislature has enacted over the state Attorney General's office.

Read more...


+ Election spotlight shines on W.Va. AG race - 8/22
+ Call for AG reform growing - 8/15
+ Oxycontin case divides McGraw's fans, foes - 8/8
+ McGraw has taken outside counsel idea to new heights - 8/1
+ Low-profile judge thrust into the spotlight - 7/30
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
+ Synagro's response to Pa. AG candidate's remarks about sludge
+ Pa. AG candidate: Corbett's sludge stance on side of corporations

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.