LegalNewsLine Logo  
Saturday, March 20 2010     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ AG Tom Miller lands in GOP crosshairs
+ Settlement reached over nutritional supplement enrollment plan‏
+ Brown gets polluting hair products taken off store shelves
+ Whitman leads Brown in latest poll
+ Texas medical malpractice law survives challenge
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Bankruptcy
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Financial Crisis
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
State Supreme Courts 
 
Supreme Court case could shrink betting choices at Florida tracks
Florida Supreme Court
TALLAHASSEE -- A lawsuit aimed at scratching slot machines from some state racetracks has finally made its way to the Florida Supreme Court.

If the suit succeeds it could kick slot machines out of all Broward County racetracks and could affect an upcoming ballot to decide the issue in Miami-Dade County. The suit has not yet been to trial.

Broward County voters allowed slots onto facilities - including horse tracks, dog tracks and jai-alai arenas - that already allow parimutuel betting in a 2004 ballot. Miami-Dade voters narrowly rejected the measure at the time but get another vote in January 2008.

Pro-gambling pressure group Floridians for a Level Playing Field (FLPF) has appealed to the Supreme Court a decision by the state's First District Court of Appeals in Tallahassee to reinstate the suit. A Tallahassee circuit judge had previously tossed it on a technicality.

Anti-gambling group Floridians Against Expanded Gambling (FAEG) and two others first filed suit in 2004 against the original referendum allowing slots at the tracks. FAEG claimed some signatures on the original petition were fraudulent.

The Supreme Court began hearing arguments Monday on the appeal (docket# SC06-2505), the origin of which was filed before the 2004 ballot. The top bench must now decide whether the anti-slots coalition can challenge signatures after they've been certified and whether such a ruling could invalidate subsequent votes.

Fraud is the key issue, maintains anti-gambling coalition attorney John Pelzer of Tallahassee-based law firm Ruden McClosky. "A very high percentage of people whose names appeared on petitions said they never signed," Pelzer recently told the Miami Herald.

But Bruce A. Rogow, representing FLFP, in confident the long-established popularity of track betting in the Sunshine State will win the day. "In the long run, this is much ado about very little," Rogow told the Herald. "The parimutuels will prevail in one fashion or another."

If Miami-Dade voters approve and FLPF wins its appeal, slot machines will be allowed at Miami Jai-Alai, Flagler Dog Track and Calder Race Course. An FLPF loss could re-set the clock to the pre-2004 gambling regime, although the SC could also send the case to trial.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Del. SC's stance on medical monitoring debated - 3/16  
+ S.C. justices overturn $18M Ford verdict - 3/15  
+ Texas medical malpractice law survives challenge - 3/15  
+ W.Va. SC won't rehear controversial $50M case - 3/11  
+ W.Va. Senate OKs business court plan - 3/10  
+ Tort reformer: N.J. SC's jurisdiction decision a dangerous one - 3/10  
+ Voters want candidates to use taxpayer money in W.Va., poll shows - 3/8  
+ New judge for Fourth Circuit - 3/3  
+ Calif. chief justice laments court closures - 2/24  
+ Colorado's Amendment 54 declared unconstitutional - 2/23  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Most of the judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals get a failing grade when it comes to the "expansion of liability," according to a judicial evaluation report.
Read more...


+ 'Land of Enchantment' in 'Hellhole': Tort reform group calls New Mexico's appeals court 'pro-liability' - 3/2
+ Group puts the brakes on Honda class action settlement - 2/23
+ AG Brown, feds sitting out whisteblower suit against pipemaker - 2/18
+ Calif. AG hopeful vows to target public employee pension increases - 2/12
+ Nebraska AG Bruning's political star rising - 2/5
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ Abbott: Beware Dietary Supplement Scams and 'Miracle' Health Claims
+ Abbott's signs of a scam
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.