LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
State Supreme Courts 
story date  
Supreme Court case could shrink betting choices at Florida tracks
FLSCSept20.jpg
Florida Supreme Court
TALLAHASSEE -- A lawsuit aimed at scratching slot machines from some state racetracks has finally made its way to the Florida Supreme Court.

If the suit succeeds it could kick slot machines out of all Broward County racetracks and could affect an upcoming ballot to decide the issue in Miami-Dade County. The suit has not yet been to trial.

Broward County voters allowed slots onto facilities - including horse tracks, dog tracks and jai-alai arenas - that already allow parimutuel betting in a 2004 ballot. Miami-Dade voters narrowly rejected the measure at the time but get another vote in January 2008.

Pro-gambling pressure group Floridians for a Level Playing Field (FLPF) has appealed to the Supreme Court a decision by the state's First District Court of Appeals in Tallahassee to reinstate the suit. A Tallahassee circuit judge had previously tossed it on a technicality.

Anti-gambling group Floridians Against Expanded Gambling (FAEG) and two others first filed suit in 2004 against the original referendum allowing slots at the tracks. FAEG claimed some signatures on the original petition were fraudulent.

The Supreme Court began hearing arguments Monday on the appeal (docket# SC06-2505), the origin of which was filed before the 2004 ballot. The top bench must now decide whether the anti-slots coalition can challenge signatures after they've been certified and whether such a ruling could invalidate subsequent votes.

Fraud is the key issue, maintains anti-gambling coalition attorney John Pelzer of Tallahassee-based law firm Ruden McClosky. "A very high percentage of people whose names appeared on petitions said they never signed," Pelzer recently told the Miami Herald.

But Bruce A. Rogow, representing FLFP, in confident the long-established popularity of track betting in the Sunshine State will win the day. "In the long run, this is much ado about very little," Rogow told the Herald. "The parimutuels will prevail in one fashion or another."

If Miami-Dade voters approve and FLPF wins its appeal, slot machines will be allowed at Miami Jai-Alai, Flagler Dog Track and Calder Race Course. An FLPF loss could re-set the clock to the pre-2004 gambling regime, although the SC could also send the case to trial.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ W.Va. SC says city can't be sued for injuries at trash station - 2/10   read more
+ S.C. chief justice says courts essential to economic development - 2/9   read more
+ Pa. SC won't meddle with Philly forum-shopping - 2/2   read more
+ D.C. high court tackles government contacts principle - 2/2   read more
+ Conn. SC: Physician's opinion in med mal case detailed enough - 2/1   read more
+ Ark. SC rules clerk's signature on summons was valid - 2/1   read more
+ Miss. SC reverses part of decision in underwriting case - 2/1   read more
+ Mo. SC upholds cap on punitive damages - 1/31   read more
+ Del. SC says firm's fee must be deducted before lien - 1/31   read more
+ Md. high court: Allergy is a handicap - 1/31   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.