LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
State Supreme Courts 
story date  
Calif. justices decline Pacific Lumber Co. fraud case
paul.jpg
Humboldt County District Attorney Paul Gallegos
SAN FRANCISCO (Legal Newsline)-The California Supreme Court has declined to review an appeals court decision that threw out a fraud case against Pacific Lumber Co.

Humboldt County District Attorney Paul Gallegos sued the Scotia, Calif.-based lumber company alleging that it nefariously secured a liberal long-term logging plan by obtaining a fraudulent advantage.

Gallegos accused the company in 2002 of clinching a liberal timber harvesting plan by submitting bogus data and later failing to correct the record until the last minute.

The district attorney sought damages in the amount of $2500 per tree cut under the company's Sustained Yield Plan, and restitution of $300 million.

Humboldt County Judge Richard Freeborn threw out the case in 2005. Gallegos appealed to the California Supreme Court.

The appellate court ruled that it was Palco's lobbying efforts that led to the California Department of Forestry to adopt a less restrictive cut.

The high court on Wednesday also rejected a request by Gallegos that a U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeal opinion in January be de-published so the case could not be precedent setting.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo by e-mail at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ W.Va. SC says city can't be sued for injuries at trash station - 2/10   read more
+ S.C. chief justice says courts essential to economic development - 2/9   read more
+ Pa. SC won't meddle with Philly forum-shopping - 2/2   read more
+ D.C. high court tackles government contacts principle - 2/2   read more
+ Conn. SC: Physician's opinion in med mal case detailed enough - 2/1   read more
+ Ark. SC rules clerk's signature on summons was valid - 2/1   read more
+ Miss. SC reverses part of decision in underwriting case - 2/1   read more
+ Mo. SC upholds cap on punitive damages - 1/31   read more
+ Del. SC says firm's fee must be deducted before lien - 1/31   read more
+ Md. high court: Allergy is a handicap - 1/31   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.