Monday, May 12, 2008
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Receive our FREE weekly e-newsletter
State Supreme Courts


5/5/2008

Calif. chief justice backs fee increases for courthouse improvements


Ronald George
Don Perata
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (Legal Newsline) - Californians could pay higher fees for civil court filings, parking tickets and criminal convictions under a plan backed by Chief Justice Ronald George and legislative leaders.

The increased fees would bankroll improvements at the state crumbling courthouses.

"The physical condition of California's courthouses has reached a state of crisis," George said Monday. "Some court buildings are in such desperate shape that they no longer provide a safe and secure environment for conducting everyday court business."

Under the plan, the cost of filing lawsuits would increase by $25 to $35, depending on the type of case, $2 would be added to parking tickets and criminal defendants would have to pay an additional $40 for convictions.

The chief justice is backing a courthouse funding proposal by Senate President Pro Tempore Don Perata, D-Oakland.

The legislation, outlined in Senate Bill 1407, would allow the state to issue $5 billion in lease revenue bonds to bankroll projects at the worst 40 of the state's 450 court facilities.

The increased fees would pay the cost of borrowing the money from investors. The Judicial Council of California has already OK'd 12 projects for the first two rounds of funding.

The bill, to be approved, would require approval by two-thirds of the state Legislature. The proposal will be heard Tuesday in the Senate Public Safety Committee.

"Everyone is guaranteed a day in court, but in California that right is jeopardized by inadequate facilities that threaten the safety of everyone in the building," Perata said.

"It is time to invest in this critical area of the state's infrastructure in a way that does not hurt the state's general fund," he added.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo by e-mail at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.


Filed Under: State Supreme Courts

Comments on this article



No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!


Send us your comments on this article





* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
Write the text from image below to this textbox


Human image test

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format


Legal Newsline-- Related Headlines


  • Schlafly rails against appointed state judges - FRIDAY, MAY 09, 2008
  • Oregon Supreme Court upholds malpractice limits - FRIDAY, MAY 09, 2008
  • Attorney had prior notice of Monaco photos - FRIDAY, MAY 09, 2008
  • Group blasts Texas Supreme Court for unsigned opinions - THURSDAY, MAY 08, 2008
  • Oregon justices affirm review of Sabbath-tourney scheduling - THURSDAY, MAY 08, 2008
  • Texas SC: No switching to arbitration on eve of trial - THURSDAY, MAY 08, 2008
  • Michigan justices give class-action status to homeowners - TUESDAY, MAY 06, 2008
  • Open space case goes before California SC today - TUESDAY, MAY 06, 2008
  • Calif. chief justice backs fee increases for courthouse improvements - MONDAY, MAY 05, 2008
  • Tenn. Justices pick next Chief - MONDAY, MAY 05, 2008
    Home


    LNLBlog.com

    State AGs
    State Supreme Courts
    U.S. Supreme Court

    Hot Topics
    Asbestos
    Big Pharma
    Dickie Scruggs
    Gasoline prices
    Global warming
    Hurricane Katrina
    Lead paint
    Personal injury
    Sub-Prime Mortgages
    Tobacco
    Tort reform
    Vioxx
    U.S. District Court

    Browse By State

    Browse By AG

    Browse By Date

    May '08
    April '08
    March '08
    February '08
    January '08
    December '07
    November '07
    October '07
    September '07
    August '07
    July '07
    June '07
    May '07
    April '07
    March '07
    February '07
    January '07
    December '06
    November '06

    LNLBlog.com

  • Session beneficial for Floridians
  • Conway: Ask me anything
  • Commonwealth's work has honored victims of Va. Tech shootings


    Most Popular

  • Capital One sues Brown over access to records
  • The business of asbestos: Manhattan Institute releases report
  • Democrats distancing from Dann, threaten action
  • Dann's impeachment findings expected
  • Dann loses support of key backer