Monday, May 12, 2008
controlabuseofpower.org
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Receive our FREE weekly e-newsletter
State Supreme Courts


5/6/2008

Michigan justices give class-action status to homeowners


LANSING, Mich. (Legal Newsline)-The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that a lawsuit filed by homeowners who say their property was damaged by roots from city-mandated trees may move forward as a class action suit.

The lawsuit-which began when 23 residents of Warren, Mich., filed a lawsuit against the city in 2000- has grown to include about 7,000 residents of the Detroit suburb.

The residents are seeking compensation for damage silver maple tree roots have done to their sewer lines and sidewalks, among other things.

For its part, the city has offered to pay half the cost of removing trees and repairing sidewalk damage done by the tree roots.

Initially, the case was denied class-action status by Macomb County Circuit Judge James Biernat.

In 2003, the state Court of Appeals overturned the ruling.

The appeals court said allowing for a class-action "would promote the convenient administration of justice."

The state Supreme Court agreed on Monday, sending the case back to Biernat.

Gerard Mantese, the attorney for the homeowners, in a statement praised the court's decision.

"I am pleased that the appellate battle is now behind us and we can proceed to obtain fair and just compensation for these homeowners, many of whom are on fixed incomes and cannot afford the necessary repairs to their sewer lines and property damage caused by the city," Mantese said.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo by e-mail at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.


Filed Under: State Supreme Courts

Comments on this article



No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!


Send us your comments on this article





* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
Write the text from image below to this textbox


Human image test

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format


Legal Newsline-- Related Headlines


  • Schlafly rails against appointed state judges - FRIDAY, MAY 09, 2008
  • Oregon Supreme Court upholds malpractice limits - FRIDAY, MAY 09, 2008
  • Attorney had prior notice of Monaco photos - FRIDAY, MAY 09, 2008
  • Group blasts Texas Supreme Court for unsigned opinions - THURSDAY, MAY 08, 2008
  • Oregon justices affirm review of Sabbath-tourney scheduling - THURSDAY, MAY 08, 2008
  • Texas SC: No switching to arbitration on eve of trial - THURSDAY, MAY 08, 2008
  • Michigan justices give class-action status to homeowners - TUESDAY, MAY 06, 2008
  • Open space case goes before California SC today - TUESDAY, MAY 06, 2008
  • Calif. chief justice backs fee increases for courthouse improvements - MONDAY, MAY 05, 2008
  • Tenn. Justices pick next Chief - MONDAY, MAY 05, 2008
    Home


    LNLBlog.com

    State AGs
    State Supreme Courts
    U.S. Supreme Court

    Hot Topics
    Asbestos
    Big Pharma
    Dickie Scruggs
    Gasoline prices
    Global warming
    Hurricane Katrina
    Lead paint
    Personal injury
    Sub-Prime Mortgages
    Tobacco
    Tort reform
    Vioxx
    U.S. District Court

    Browse By State

    Browse By AG

    Browse By Date

    May '08
    April '08
    March '08
    February '08
    January '08
    December '07
    November '07
    October '07
    September '07
    August '07
    July '07
    June '07
    May '07
    April '07
    March '07
    February '07
    January '07
    December '06
    November '06

    LNLBlog.com

  • Session beneficial for Floridians
  • Conway: Ask me anything
  • Commonwealth's work has honored victims of Va. Tech shootings


    Most Popular

  • Capital One sues Brown over access to records
  • The business of asbestos: Manhattan Institute releases report
  • Democrats distancing from Dann, threaten action
  • Dann's impeachment findings expected
  • Dann loses support of key backer