LegalNewsLine Logo  
Saturday, February 11 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
Tort Reform 
story date  
Oklahoma governor considers tort reform bill
Henry.jpg
Gov. Brad Henry
OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla. (Legal Newsline)-Legislation that would require an expert opinion confirming professional negligence before a lawsuit could be filed is headed to Oklahoma Gov. Brad Henry's desk.

The measure, outlined in House Bill 2458, is widely expected to be vetoed by the Democratic governor.

Critics say the proposal, championed by some House Republicans, resembles legislation passed in 2004 that the state Supreme Court struck down in 2006 as unconstitutional.

In that case, the high court ruled that the costs associated with obtaining so-called "certificates of merit" placed an undue financial burden on litigants.

Proponents, however, say the law would curb frivolous lawsuits that clog the state court's civil dockets.

"It has been my personal experience that requiring an expert report prior to filing a lawsuit has the effect of greatly reducing frivolous lawsuits," state Rep. Dan Sullivan, R-Tulsa, was quoted by The Journal Record as saying.

"It is not proper to file a case and then find out if it has merit. Requiring an expert report will be a big step in the right direction for our state," he added.

Last month, Oklahoma lawmakers jettisoned a proposed comprehensive tort overhaul.

The proposal would have asked voters whether to cap attorney contingency fees at 33 percent instead of 50 percent in personal injury cases.

State lawmakers originally sought to cap non-economic damages at $300,000 and require potential members of a class action to opt into participation in the lawsuit.

The legislation, long sought by tort reformers, also would have included a joint and several liability provision that would require monetary judgments to be issued based on who is at fault rather than which of the defendants can afford to pay the award.

Once it reached a full House vote, the 120-page bill was amended to just place on the ballot a proposal to cap contingency fees in personal injury cases.

Current Oklahoma law prohibits attorneys from claiming more than 50 percent of a jury award as an attorney fee.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo by e-mail at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: Hot Topics

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ N.M. working on laws to limit lawsuits by future space travelers - 2/10   read more
+ Civil justice reform bills introduced in N.J. Legislature - 1/20   read more
+ Pa. House passes punitive damages limit - 1/18   read more
+ N.J. group opposes consumer contracts legislation - 12/20   read more
+ Good news, bad news for Texas in latest 'Hellhole' report - 12/15   read more
+ Ill. counties find themselves designated 'hellholes' - 12/15   read more
+ Positives don't outweigh negatives in W.Va., report says - 12/15   read more
+ Tort reform group has its eyes on Louisiana - 12/15   read more
+ Drug maker wants Pa. SC to rein in Philly court - 12/12   read more
+ Pa. lawmaker behind 'venue shopping' bill discusses legislation - 12/5   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.