LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, September 7 2008     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ August not a good month for Internet travel company
+ Washington court rules against arbitration clause
+ Brown joins fight over Orange County deputies' pensions
+ Ohio AG partners with FBI on raid on pharmacy
+ Door-to-door sales company settles with Calif. again
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
+ Tort Reform
U.S. Supreme Court 
 
Toyota loses $4.3 million patent appeal for hybrid technology
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)-The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday affirmed a $4.3 million award against Toyota Motor Corp. for using another company's patented technology in its hybrid vehicles.

Without comment, the high court declined to hear an appeal by Toyota to overturn the damage award given to Paice LLC of McLean, Va.

An appeals court recently told a trial judge to reconsider a ruling that made Toyota pay $25 for every Prius, Highlander and Lexus RX400h sold using the disputed technology.

The technology involves a microprocessor that accepts torque information from the internal combustion engine and the electric motor.

In its appeal to the Supreme Court, Toyota said Paice was a "patent litigation company," attempting to "impose a royalty toll on the Prius and similar Toyota hybrid vehicles based on an obscure patent."

Urging the justices not to hear the case, Paice said the market for hybrid cars "did not take off" until Toyota "revamped its vehicle program" with technology Paice patented almost a decade earlier.

The case is Toyota Motor v. Paice, 07-1120.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo by e-mail at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Supreme Court declines to hear Exxon Valdez interest question - 8/12  
+ Massey foe wants U.S. Supreme Court to put W. Va. Justice off cas... - 7/28  
+ Leahy criticizes 'pro-business' Supreme Court - 7/23  
+ Judiciary Committee to probe 'pro-business' Supreme Court rulings - 7/21  
+ Exxon fights interest payments to Exxon Valdez plaintiffs - 7/16  
+ UPDATE: Exxon Valdez plaintiffs seek interest award - 7/12  
+ Age bias ruling could lead to flood of employment lawsuits - 7/12  
+ Starr may defend Arizona's English learner funding - 7/12  
+ AGs celebrate landmark firearms ruling - 6/26  
+ McKenna laments Exxon ruling - 6/25  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Friday, August 29, 2008
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (Legal Newsline) - When House Bill 104 passed during the first Special Session of this year's state Legislature, it did so with little fanfare. Yet it represents to date the single act of oversight the Legislature has enacted over the state Attorney General's office.

Read more...


+ Election spotlight shines on W.Va. AG race - 8/22
+ Call for AG reform growing - 8/15
+ Oxycontin case divides McGraw's fans, foes - 8/8
+ McGraw has taken outside counsel idea to new heights - 8/1
+ Low-profile judge thrust into the spotlight - 7/30
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
+ Synagro's response to Pa. AG candidate's remarks about sludge
+ Pa. AG candidate: Corbett's sludge stance on side of corporations

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.