LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, March 21 2010     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Settlement reached over nutritional supplement enrollment plan‏
+ AG Tom Miller lands in GOP crosshairs
+ Whitman leads Brown in latest poll
+ Brown gets polluting hair products taken off store shelves
+ Texas medical malpractice law survives challenge
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Bankruptcy
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Financial Crisis
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
State Supreme Courts 
 
Allstate challenges Fla. Insurance commissioner
Kevin McCarty
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (Legal Newsline) - Allstate is asking the Florida Supreme Court to review a lower court's decision suspending it from selling insurance in the Sunshine State.

Allstate argued to the high court that the First District Court of Appeals' erred when it upheld the actions of the state insurance commission, which last week suspended Allstate's authority to write new insurance policies in Florida.

The lower court had declared the insurer's right to due process had not been violated when the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation temporarily suspended it from selling insurance policies.

Allstate called that a "conclusion" that was "contrary to due process," as well as violating requirements of state laws, and the state and federal constitutions.

In a brief filed Monday, Allstate argued, "a judicial determination of objections and privileges are required before an administrative agency can enforce its own subpoenas."

The insurer also argued that the appeals court created a "relaxed standard" when it had concluded that the Florida Office of Insurance "could self-enforce its subpoenas instead of pursuing enforcement in circuit court."

"First DCA's decision expressly and directly conflicts with the decisions of two district courts of appeal and with two decisions of this Court," Allstate attorneys said in the brief.

The problem occurred when Allstate Floridian Insurance Co. didn't comply with subpoenas for documents from Florida Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty.

Allstate's refusal to comply meant it should be barred from writing new insurance policies in the state, McCarty said, and the First District Court of Appeal agreed.

However, McCarty's insistence the company comply with its subpoenas without a circuit court order denied Allstate its fundamental due process because a judicial determination was required before an administrative agency, such as the Florida Insurance Commission, can enforce its subpoenas for documents, Allstate said in the filing.

After Allstate was suspended from writing new policies in Florida last week, McCarty stayed the suspension after Allstate filed an affidavit with McCarty saying it had given the insurance commission's office all the documents it requested.

Although the stay allowed Allstate to resume writing insurance policies in Florida there is no guarantee the state will allow it to continue doing so.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Lin Young at linyoung10@gmail.com.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Del. SC's stance on medical monitoring debated - 3/16  
+ S.C. justices overturn $18M Ford verdict - 3/15  
+ Texas medical malpractice law survives challenge - 3/15  
+ W.Va. SC won't rehear controversial $50M case - 3/11  
+ W.Va. Senate OKs business court plan - 3/10  
+ Tort reformer: N.J. SC's jurisdiction decision a dangerous one - 3/10  
+ Voters want candidates to use taxpayer money in W.Va., poll shows - 3/8  
+ New judge for Fourth Circuit - 3/3  
+ Calif. chief justice laments court closures - 2/24  
+ Colorado's Amendment 54 declared unconstitutional - 2/23  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Most of the judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals get a failing grade when it comes to the "expansion of liability," according to a judicial evaluation report.
Read more...


+ 'Land of Enchantment' in 'Hellhole': Tort reform group calls New Mexico's appeals court 'pro-liability' - 3/2
+ Group puts the brakes on Honda class action settlement - 2/23
+ AG Brown, feds sitting out whisteblower suit against pipemaker - 2/18
+ Calif. AG hopeful vows to target public employee pension increases - 2/12
+ Nebraska AG Bruning's political star rising - 2/5
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ Abbott: Beware Dietary Supplement Scams and 'Miracle' Health Claims
+ Abbott's signs of a scam
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.