LegalNewsLine Logo  
Saturday, February 11 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
Vioxx 
story date  
Appeals courts overturn Vioxx verdicts
Merck.GIF
(Legal Newsline) - Merck & Co. Inc. notched two major legal victories Thursday, with appeals courts in Texas and New Jersey tossing verdicts against the drugmaker involving the painkiller Vioxx.

In Texas, the court reversed a $26 million verdict against the Whitehouse Station, N.J.-based pharmaceutical giant.

In that case, the court ruled that there was no evidence to support claims that Robert Ernst suffered a fatal heart problem from a blood clot triggered by the once-popular medication.

Ernst's widow had won a $253 million verdict against Merck in 2005, but Texas' punitive damage award caps reduced the award to $26.1 million.

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals, in its decision, said while "the epidemiological evidence supports the conclusion that Vioxx use at a certain dose and duration is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events," there is no evidence to support a claim.

"Accordingly, appellee failed to show that the ingestion of Vioxx caused her husband's death," Chief Justice Adele Hedges wrote.

Merck took Vioxx, a non steroidal anti inflammatory drug, off pharmacy shelves in September 2004, after an internal study showed that Vioxx doubles risk of heart attack or stroke.

In New Jersey, an appeals court rejected most of the $13.9 million awarded to John McDarby in 2006. McDarby suffered a heart attack in 2004, but recovered.

In its decision, the court ruled that the state's Product Liability Act was pre-empted by the federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act.

The two cases were excluded from the settlement Merck reached in November in which it agreed to pay $4.85 billion to settle thousands of other Vioxx-related suits.

In a statement, Merck executive vice president and general counsel Bruce Kuhlik praised the rulings.

"We are gratified that the Texas appeals court correctly found that VIOXX did not cause Mr. Ernst's death and reversed the previous decision for the plaintiff in the first VIOXX case to go to trial," Kuhlik said.

"In addition, the New Jersey court correctly reversed the awards of punitive damage and consumer fraud. Today's decisions overturn almost $40 million of damages and attorneys fees previously awarded to plaintiffs at trial," he added.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo by e-mail at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: Hot Topics

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ AG Caldwell loses Vioxx lawsuit - 6/30   read more
+ Unions sue over Vioxx settlement - 6/10   read more
+ Lawyer vows to appeal $26 million Vioxx reversal - 5/29   read more
+ Appeals courts overturn Vioxx verdicts - 5/29   read more
+ AG Zyprexa suits in money as Boston DA lands $515m - 10/1   read more
+ U.S. Supreme Court could boot some Big Pharma lawsuits next year - 9/26   read more
+ Vioxx suit filed before statute expired - 11/17   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.