LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
Vioxx 
story date  
Lawyer vows to appeal $26 million Vioxx reversal
mark_lanier.jpg
W. Mark Lanier
HOUSTON, Texas (Legal Newsline)--The famed Houston plaintiffs' attorney who Thursday saw a Texas appeals court toss out his client's $26.1 million verdict against Merck & Co. Inc. over the company's drug Vioxx said his client will appeal.

Merck took Vioxx, a non-steroidal anti inflammatory drug, off pharmacy shelves in September 2004, after an internal study showed that Vioxx doubles risk of heart attack or stroke.

The 14th Court of Appeals in Texas ruled that Whitehouse Station, N.J.-based Merck was not responsible for the death of Robert Ernst, 59, who suffered a fatal heart problem from a blood clot allegedly triggered by the once-popular medication. He died in 2001.

"Activist judges are protecting corporate executives and stripping away the rights of widows and every other victim of corporate misconduct. We are filing an appeal," said attorney W. Mark Lanier, who represented Ernst's widow, Carol Ernst.

Lanier said the decision was rendered by a panel of judges who "regularly accept campaign contributions from law firms representing corporations that appear in their courts."

He added that he is prepared to appeal all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, if necessary.

In August 2005, Ernst's widow had won a $253 million verdict against Merck in 2005, but Texas' punitive damage award caps reduced the award to $26.1 million.

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals, in its decision Thursday, said while "the epidemiological evidence supports the conclusion that Vioxx use at a certain dose and duration is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events," there is no evidence to support a claim.

"We find no evidence that Ernst suffered a thrombotic cardiovascular event, i.e., a myocardial infraction triggered by a blood clot. Accordingly, appellee failed to show that the ingestion of Vioxx caused her husband's death," Chief Justice Adele Hedges wrote.

Also on the three-judge panel were Justices John Anderson and Jeff Brown.

Merck says that of the 18 plaintiffs whose Vioxx cases went to trial, only three have outstanding judgments against the pharmaceutical company.

In a statement, Merck's executive vice president and general counsel Bruce Kuhlik said the company is happy that the justices found that Merck was not liable for Ernst's death.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo by e-mail at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: Hot Topics

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ AG Caldwell loses Vioxx lawsuit - 6/30   read more
+ Unions sue over Vioxx settlement - 6/10   read more
+ Lawyer vows to appeal $26 million Vioxx reversal - 5/29   read more
+ Appeals courts overturn Vioxx verdicts - 5/29   read more
+ AG Zyprexa suits in money as Boston DA lands $515m - 10/1   read more
+ U.S. Supreme Court could boot some Big Pharma lawsuits next year - 9/26   read more
+ Vioxx suit filed before statute expired - 11/17   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.