LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, July 5 2009     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Powell: Sotomayor nomination should not be derailed
+ U.S. Supreme Court sides with white firefighters in race bias case
+ U.S. Supreme Court: State AGs may probe national lending practices
+ King: Rethink GM bankruptcy plan
+ Obama says Supreme Court 'moving the ball' on affirmative action
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Bankruptcy
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Financial Crisis
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
State Supreme Courts 
 
Washington justices say public records can be kept from inmates
Justice Barbara Madsen
OLYMPIA, Wash. (Legal Newsline)-Although Washington inmates are entitled to government records, prison officials can keep those papers from prisoners if the information is considered contraband, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

In a 5-4 high court ruling could affect the flow of information to Washingtonians behind bars, analysts said.

The case came after a Public Records Act request from Michael B. Livingston, who was serving time for armed robbery, was denie.

He sought training records of a corrections officer.

Although the state Department of Corrections complied with the request, the papers were intercepted in the mailroom of the Cedar Creek Corrections Center in Littlerock, Wash.

Prison officials told Livingston he could not receive records about Department of Corrections employees. He could, however, have the records forwarded to someone else who was not in custody.

Livingston sued, claiming the Corrections Department was improperly using its mail rule to block lawful requests for public records.

The Supreme Court ruled against him, saying the Department of Corrections fulfilled its responsibility under the Public Records Act when the records were mailed to Livingston.

"The Public Records Act does not limit the department's discretion in prohibiting entry of public records that it reasonably deems inappropriate in a prison setting," Justice Barbara Madsen wrote for the majority.

The majority opinion was signed by Chief Justice Gerry Alexander and Justices Bobbe Bridge, Mary Fairhurst and Charles Johnson.

A dissenting opinion by Justice James Johnson said prison rules should not be able to block requests under the Public Records Act.

"Since making records available and withholding them are mutually incompatible, the laws conflict, and the Public Records Act controls," Johnson wrote.

The case is No. 79608-4, Livingston v. Cedeno.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo by e-mail at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Ohio justices to hear satellite TV tax case - 7/1  
+ Minn. Supreme Court: Al Franken won Minnesota Senate race - 7/1  
+ Nevada SC approves rules for new foreclosure mediation program - 6/30  
+ N.J. Senate gives justice tenure - 6/29  
+ Civil justice group says 'right decision, wrong author' in court'... - 6/24  
+ Arizona Supreme Court sidesteps budget battle - 6/24  
+ Justice Albin one step closer to tenure - 6/23  
+ Sheetz unhappy with Pa. SC decision - 6/16  
+ Utah SC hears DRAM price-fixing case - 6/13  
+ Calif. court: Businesses may be sued for unintentional ADA violat... - 6/12  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Monday, June 29, 2009
WASHNGTON (Legal Newsline) - The federal government plans to withhold nearly a half-million dollars the next time it doles out Medicaid funding to the State of West Virginia as a result of a settlement engineered by state Attorney General Darrell McGraw.
Read more...


+ The Libby verdict: Did the judge play favorites? - 6/2
+ Sotomayor can expect plenty of scrutiny - 5/26
+ The Libby verdict: Prosecutors make a fatal mistake - 5/21
+ California judge accuses asbestos firms of playing 'grisly games' - 5/5
+ GOP calls for outside counsel reform in wake of Rendell controversy - 4/23
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ Abbott: Beware Dietary Supplement Scams and 'Miracle' Health Claims
+ Abbott's signs of a scam
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.