LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, September 7 2008     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ August not a good month for Internet travel company
+ Washington court rules against arbitration clause
+ Brown joins fight over Orange County deputies' pensions
+ Ohio AG partners with FBI on raid on pharmacy
+ Door-to-door sales company settles with Calif. again
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
+ Tort Reform
U.S. District Court 
 
Lawsuit challenges Mass. ban on some wine shipments
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (Legal Newsline) - California winemakers will take its opposition of laws blocking some wineries from shipping directly to Massachusetts consumers to U.S. District Court later this month.

Arguments in a lawsuit filed by Family Winemakers of California will be heard July 29.

Family Winemakers of California filed suit in 2006 against the Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission, against a law enacted that same year the limits direct wine sales in the state to vineyards that produce less than 30,000 gallons of wine a year and those that haven't used a wholesaler in the last six months.

The Massachusetts attorney general's office denies the law discriminates based on production size of a winery.

In previous motions filed with the court, the attorney general's office contends that similar laws in Maine, Kentucky and Arizona were upheld in court, and that 89 percent of all wineries are eligible for a permit to sell and that wineries should be forced to choose between direct selling and wholesale shipping to the state.

In its response brief, Family Winemakers of California challenged the state's assertions and legal precedent for how relevant state law should be fairly applied.

"Small producers have proven to the court (this) Massachusetts law harms interstate commerce by excluding 98 percent of all wine made in America from direct sales and suppresses consumer choice," said Paul Kronenberg, FWC President, in a recent press release.

"Out-of-state producers making more than 30,000 gallons of wine shouldn't be forced to choose between selling directly to consumers or selling only through the wholesale channel," he said.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney vetoed the legislation in 2006 saying the law would have a negative effect on the consumer. The Republican governor's veto was overridden by the state Legislature.

Kronenberg of the Family Winemakers of California said the lawsuit is a straight-forward appeal for a level playing field in the marketplace.

"Wineries want the court to invalidate key sections of Massachusetts law and level up so that all producers, regardless of size, can compete in the Massachusetts market on their terms," he said.

Wineries across the country have become increasingly vocal in opposing state by state laws that restrict direct shipping.

Georgia recently removed several restrictions on its laws, while a push to pass a direct shipping bill that would add restrictions in Florida failed to pass the Legislature.


Filed Under: U.S. District Court


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Union pickets allowed in Calif. shopping malls - 8/26  
+ Judge sets hearing for challenge to McCain's candidacy - 8/23  
+ John McCain sued by singer Jackson Browne - 8/16  
+ Fen-Phen lawyer wants out of jail - 7/23  
+ Railroad to pay $102 million to settle lawsuit over Calif. wildfi... - 7/23  
+ Lawsuit challenges Mass. ban on some wine shipments - 7/16  
+ Restaurants fight new menu law - 7/14  
+ Mukasey says Siegelman prosecution probe a priority - 7/9  
+ Fen-Phen lawyers face re-trial - 7/7  
+ 9th Circuit panel considers Arizona's immigration law - 6/16  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Friday, August 29, 2008
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (Legal Newsline) - When House Bill 104 passed during the first Special Session of this year's state Legislature, it did so with little fanfare. Yet it represents to date the single act of oversight the Legislature has enacted over the state Attorney General's office.

Read more...


+ Election spotlight shines on W.Va. AG race - 8/22
+ Call for AG reform growing - 8/15
+ Oxycontin case divides McGraw's fans, foes - 8/8
+ McGraw has taken outside counsel idea to new heights - 8/1
+ Low-profile judge thrust into the spotlight - 7/30
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
+ Synagro's response to Pa. AG candidate's remarks about sludge
+ Pa. AG candidate: Corbett's sludge stance on side of corporations

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.