LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, September 7 2008     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ August not a good month for Internet travel company
+ Washington court rules against arbitration clause
+ Brown joins fight over Orange County deputies' pensions
+ Ohio AG partners with FBI on raid on pharmacy
+ Door-to-door sales company settles with Calif. again
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
+ Tort Reform
U.S. Supreme Court 
 
Exxon fights interest payments to Exxon Valdez plaintiffs
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)-Exxon Mobil Corp. says it should not have to pay interest on the $507.5 million judgment the U.S. Supreme Court ordered it to pay for the Exxon Valdez oil spill.

In papers filed Tuesday with the U.S. Supreme Court, the Irving, Texas-based company argues it should not have to pay interest on the award, which would push the amount it owes plaintiffs in the case to nearly $1 billion.

In a nine-page brief to the justices, Exxon said Tuesday that there is "no good reason" for the high court to add interest.

"Exxon does not agree that there is any sound basis to award plaintiffs what they seek -- approximately $488 million over and above the $507.5 million that this Court determined was the legally proper amount to punish and deter," Exxon's filing says.

The Exxon papers were filed in response to a brief filed by an attorney for the plaintiffs that said his clients are owed about $488 million in accrued interest since an Anchorage jury awarded them $5 billion in 1994 for the 11 million gallons of crude oil that leaked into the waters of Prince William Sound in March 1989.

A divided Supreme Court last month reduced the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in the long-running lawsuit to no more than $507.5 million, ruling 5-3 that the original award was excessive.

In its ruling, the majority held that the punitive damages should be equal to the compensatory damages.

Judges have discretion in whether to award interest payments. In the federal courts, rules say that interest payments are calculated by a certain Federal Reserve rate available at the time of the award. In the Exxon case, that rate was 5.9 percent.

The 32,677 plaintiffs in the case have been waiting for their award since 1994, when an Anchorage jury returned a $5 billion punitive-damages verdict against Exxon Mobil Corp.

In 2006, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco reduced the award to $2.5 billion. Exxon then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The case is Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 07-219.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Supreme Court declines to hear Exxon Valdez interest question - 8/12  
+ Massey foe wants U.S. Supreme Court to put W. Va. Justice off cas... - 7/28  
+ Leahy criticizes 'pro-business' Supreme Court - 7/23  
+ Judiciary Committee to probe 'pro-business' Supreme Court rulings - 7/21  
+ Exxon fights interest payments to Exxon Valdez plaintiffs - 7/16  
+ UPDATE: Exxon Valdez plaintiffs seek interest award - 7/12  
+ Age bias ruling could lead to flood of employment lawsuits - 7/12  
+ Starr may defend Arizona's English learner funding - 7/12  
+ AGs celebrate landmark firearms ruling - 6/26  
+ McKenna laments Exxon ruling - 6/25  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Friday, August 29, 2008
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (Legal Newsline) - When House Bill 104 passed during the first Special Session of this year's state Legislature, it did so with little fanfare. Yet it represents to date the single act of oversight the Legislature has enacted over the state Attorney General's office.

Read more...


+ Election spotlight shines on W.Va. AG race - 8/22
+ Call for AG reform growing - 8/15
+ Oxycontin case divides McGraw's fans, foes - 8/8
+ McGraw has taken outside counsel idea to new heights - 8/1
+ Low-profile judge thrust into the spotlight - 7/30
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
+ Synagro's response to Pa. AG candidate's remarks about sludge
+ Pa. AG candidate: Corbett's sludge stance on side of corporations

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.