LegalNewsLine Logo  
Saturday, February 11 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
State Supreme Courts 
story date  
Milwaukee loses appeal in lead paint case
curley.jpg
Patricia Curley
MADISON, Wis. (Legal Newsline) - A Wisconsin state appeals court has rejected the city of Milwaukee's effort to force a former lead paint manufacturer to pay for the cleanup of thousands of contaminated properties.

The District 1 Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that NL Industries Inc. does not have to pay the city's costs of cleaning up about 11,000 homes contaminated by lead paint.

In a 2001 lawsuit, the city had sought to recover $52.6 million in damages for a cleanup program from 1992 to 2006. The federal government banned the use of lead in household paint in 1978.

Last year, a Milwaukee County jury ruled that although lead paint in Milwaukee homes was a public nuisance, NL Industries had not "intentionally and unreasonably engage in conduct" that caused the contamination.

The city of Milwaukee appealed the decision.

Officials argued that NL Industries knew for many years that childhood lead poisoning posed a serious health danger, and even so continued to sell their products.

The city also sought a new trial, arguing, among other things, that there were five purported erroneous rulings on the jury instructions, three allegedly separate instances of improperly admitted evidence and because of the trial court's decision to dismiss the city's nuisance claim based on reckless conduct.

The appeals court, in a 2-1 ruling, rejected the city's arguments.

"We conclude that there is credible evidence in the record to support the jury's conclusion that NL Industries did not know that the public nuisance found by the jury was resulting or was substantially certain to result from its conduct, where the dangers associated with lead dust, which are largely responsible for the hazardous childhood lead exposure at issue, were unknown during the time NL Industries sold lead pigment and paint," Presiding Judge Patricia Curley wrote for her and Judge Ralph Adam Fine.

Judge Joan Kessler dissented, saying the city was entitled to a new trial.

Similar lawsuits filed by local officials in Missouri, New Jersey, Illinois and Rhode Island have been rejected by courts.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ W.Va. SC says city can't be sued for injuries at trash station - 2/10   read more
+ S.C. chief justice says courts essential to economic development - 2/9   read more
+ Pa. SC won't meddle with Philly forum-shopping - 2/2   read more
+ D.C. high court tackles government contacts principle - 2/2   read more
+ Conn. SC: Physician's opinion in med mal case detailed enough - 2/1   read more
+ Ark. SC rules clerk's signature on summons was valid - 2/1   read more
+ Miss. SC reverses part of decision in underwriting case - 2/1   read more
+ Mo. SC upholds cap on punitive damages - 1/31   read more
+ Del. SC says firm's fee must be deducted before lien - 1/31   read more
+ Md. high court: Allergy is a handicap - 1/31   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.