LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
U.S. Supreme Court 
story date  
Colorado, Kansas AGs to appear before Supreme Court over water case
scotus.jpg
clear
suthers.jpg
John Suthers (R)
clear
six.jpg
Steve Six (D)
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)-Attorneys general from Colorado and Kansas on Monday will appear before the U.S. Supreme Court to settle a dispute over expert witness fees related to a long-running water dispute.

For Colorado, Attorney General John Suthers contends that his state should not have to pay $9 million in expert witness fess that Kansas says Colorado taxpayers ought to pay since it was the prevailing party in a protracted water rights case.

Suthers, a former U.S. attorney, and Kansas Attorney General Steve Six will appear in court 23 years after the original lawsuit was filed over flows in the Arkansas River.

For his part, Six will try to persuade the justices to overturn earlier rulings limiting how much Colorado has to pay Kansas for breaking their water agreement, which was signed in 1949.

In 2003, Colorado paid Kansas $34.6 million in damages and interest after it was determined that it violated its water compact with Kansas by taking more water than it was allowed from 1950 to 1996.

Monday's hearing will be the first time for Suthers or Six, who was appointed Kansas attorney general less than a year ago, to appear before the nation's highest court.

In the latest legal tussle related to the water battle, Kansas says it is owed about $10 million, arguing the federal cap on expert witnesses of $40 per day does not apply to cases that go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court since the case arrived before the justices without going through lower courts.

Kansas, among other things, is seeking reimbursement of costs for developing computer modeling used to make its case.

Arthur Littleworth, a water expert in the Riverside, Calif.-based law firm of Best Best & Krieger LLP, served as the Supreme Court's special master in the case since 1987. He had a stroke earlier this year, and will not attend Monday's hearing.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Bill to televise U.S. SC passes committee - 2/9   read more
+ Coakley, Cuccinelli to debate health care law - 2/2   read more
+ Keep Fair Housing Act strong, AGs argue to U.S. SC - 2/1   read more
+ Supreme Court affirms federal preemption in Calif. case - 1/24   read more
+ 'Peter and the Wolf' must be paid - 1/24   read more
+ U.S. SC issues stay in W.Va. redistricting case - 1/23   read more
+ State Dept. files amicus favoring corporate liability - 1/23   read more
+ U.S. SC says federal court erred in drawing Texas redistricting p... - 1/20   read more
+ Supreme Court says telemarketing cases eligible for federal court... - 1/19   read more
+ U.S. SC approves nuisance call lawsuits for federal court - 1/18   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.