LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
U.S. Supreme Court 
story date  
U.S. Supreme Court hears Oregon cigarette case, again
scotus.jpg
U.S. Supreme Court building
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)-The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday heard for the third time arguments over a $79.5 million punitive damages award against tobacco company Altria Group Inc.'s Philip Morris USA unit.

Philip Morris, which is seeking a new trial, says the Oregon Supreme Court circumvented a 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court ruling the company won last year.

The Oregon court subsequently reaffirmed the award, which is a record for a tobacco case, finding that the tobacco company flouted a state procedural requirement.

The original case was brought by Mayola Williams of Portland, Ore., the widow of a smoker who died of cancer in 1997, after smoking Marlboros for 42 years.

Williams' late husband, Jesse, began smoking in 1950. He was diagnosed with lung cancer in 1996, and he died the following year. An Oregon jury awarded Williams $821,485 in actual damages and $79.5 million in punitive damages.

Philip Morris, the world's largest cigarette maker, appealed the case to the U.S. high court after the Oregon Supreme Court left the entire award intact despite a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that had overturned the judgment against the cigarette maker.

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the award in 2003, following its pattern of ruling that punitive damages should generally be no more than nine times the size of compensatory damages.

But in its ruling, the Oregon Supreme Court said Philip Morris could not challenge the verdict because it failed to comply with state court procedural rules regarding jury instructions in the case.

"The Oregon Supreme Court's defiance of this court's directive should not be countenanced," Philip Morris said in the appeal. "The Oregon Supreme Court had no authority either to disobey the clear instructions of this court or to conjure up state-law procedural grounds for the judgment."

Because the case has lingered in the courts, the award, including interest accrued since the judgment, could cost Philip Morris as much as $145 million.

Under Oregon law, 60 percent of punitive damages go to the crime victims' assistance fund.

The case is Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 07-1216.

Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Bill to televise U.S. SC passes committee - 2/9   read more
+ Coakley, Cuccinelli to debate health care law - 2/2   read more
+ Keep Fair Housing Act strong, AGs argue to U.S. SC - 2/1   read more
+ Supreme Court affirms federal preemption in Calif. case - 1/24   read more
+ 'Peter and the Wolf' must be paid - 1/24   read more
+ U.S. SC issues stay in W.Va. redistricting case - 1/23   read more
+ State Dept. files amicus favoring corporate liability - 1/23   read more
+ U.S. SC says federal court erred in drawing Texas redistricting p... - 1/20   read more
+ Supreme Court says telemarketing cases eligible for federal court... - 1/19   read more
+ U.S. SC approves nuisance call lawsuits for federal court - 1/18   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.