LegalNewsLine Logo  
Saturday, March 20 2010     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ AG Tom Miller lands in GOP crosshairs
+ Settlement reached over nutritional supplement enrollment plan‏
+ Brown gets polluting hair products taken off store shelves
+ Whitman leads Brown in latest poll
+ Texas medical malpractice law survives challenge
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Bankruptcy
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Financial Crisis
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
Tobacco 
 
N.Y. court rules in favor of tobacco companies in $20 mil suit
Smith
ALBANY, N.Y. (Legal Newsline) - New York's higher court has rejected an argument that says tobacco companies have been negligent in their designs of cigarettes, using levels of nicotine and tar that are too high.

The state Court of Appeals' 6-1 decision on Tuesday reversed a 2005 jury award of more than $20 million in favor of Frank Adamo, the executor of the Estate of Norma Rose. Rose died of lung cancer during the appeal.

The suit against Brown & Williamson and Phillip Morris claimed selling light cigarettes meant the design of regular cigarettes was negligent. On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court gave the go-ahead for smokers to file suits that argue the "light" label was misleading.

"(I)t is still lawful for people to buy and smoke regular cigarettes, and for cigarette companies to sell them," Judge Robert Smith wrote for the majority.

"To hold, as plaintiffs ask, that every sale of regular cigarettes exposes the manufacturer to tort liability would amount to a judicial ban on the product. If regular cigarettes are to be banned, that should be done by legislative bodies, not by courts."

Smith added that it is uncontested that smokers do not find light cigarettes as satisfying as regular ones.

Judge Eugene Pigott was the lone dissenter, though he would have ordered a new trial instead of affirming the award.

"At trial, defendants moved to offer evidence tending to prove that the 'safer alternative design' suggested by plaintiffs was not feasible because it was not acceptable to consumers (i.e., not commercially viable)," Pigott wrote.

"The trial court denied that motion, concluding that evidence of commercial viability of the lighter cigarette was irrelevant to its feasibility or functionality. That was error and, therefore, I would remit the matter to the Supreme Court for a new trial to permit defendants the opportunity to present proof of the alleged commercial unacceptability of the lighter cigarette as compared to the regular cigarette."

From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at john@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: Hot Topics


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Tobacco suit sets record in Fla. county - 3/17  
+ Vt. judge rules against R.J. Reynolds - 3/15  
+ Ohio SC will rule on tobacco funds dispute - 3/15  
+ Organic tobacco company agrees to disclaimer - 3/4  
+ Tobacco companies get marginal success in challenge to law - 1/7  
+ AGs offer support to FDA - 1/4  
+ Arbitration to begin in tobacco agreement dispute - 12/10  
+ Mass. SC sides with smokers in medical monitoring issue - 10/20  
+ Tobacco companies sue feds over new law - 9/1  
+ Kroger sues e-cigarette company, settles with others - 8/20  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Most of the judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals get a failing grade when it comes to the "expansion of liability," according to a judicial evaluation report.
Read more...


+ 'Land of Enchantment' in 'Hellhole': Tort reform group calls New Mexico's appeals court 'pro-liability' - 3/2
+ Group puts the brakes on Honda class action settlement - 2/23
+ AG Brown, feds sitting out whisteblower suit against pipemaker - 2/18
+ Calif. AG hopeful vows to target public employee pension increases - 2/12
+ Nebraska AG Bruning's political star rising - 2/5
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ Abbott: Beware Dietary Supplement Scams and 'Miracle' Health Claims
+ Abbott's signs of a scam
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.