LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
U.S. District Court 
story date  
Appeals court revives ex-inmate's asbestos lawsuit
WICHITA, Kan. (Legal Newsline)-New breath has been breathed into a former inmate's lawsuit claiming he was exposed to asbestos at the federal penitentiary in Leavenworth, Kan.

A three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver ruled that the lawsuit filed by Bryon Smith should be sent back to a federal trial court in Wichita.

Smith has claimed he was exposed to cancer-causing asbestos fibers in 2003, while installing an electrical fixture at the prison. He states he has developed an asbestos-related respiratory illness as a result.

He alleges that prison officials knew the closet contained asbestos because a 1994 survey by a consulting firm found asbestos fibers in the building.

The plaintiff says by knowingly exposing him to asbestos, prison officials violated his Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment.

He has asked for $100,000 in compensatory and punitive damages, $2 million for negligence, $100,000 for the loss or destruction of his medical records and an unspecified amount for future medical expenses.

U.S. District Judge J. Thomas Marten dismissed the lawsuit in 2007. The judge ruled that Smith failed to show the prison officials were aware of the risks of asbestos exposure.

In Tuesday's ruling, the appeals court said Marten erred when he dismissed the lawsuit against prison officials who were sued in their individual capacities. The court, however, said Smith cannot sue the federal government.

"As the litigation progresses, it is possible the government will produce evidence showing that some or all of the individual defendants did not know that the 1994 Ramsey-Schilling survey disclosed the presence of asbestos in the closet, based on simple lack of knowledge or intervening circumstances," the appeals court said. "However, these are matters to be determined at a later point in the case."

Smith represented himself at trial. During his appeal, he was represented by attorney Daniel Volchok of the Washington law firm of WilmerHale.

From Legal Newsline: Reach staff reporter Chris Rizo at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: U.S. District Court

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Report: Plan to speed up judicial nominations could be stalled - 2/9   read more
+ Fosomax case transferred to N.J. federal court - 2/3   read more
+ Law professor: Cordray appointment could affect judicial nominees - 1/23   read more
+ Federal judge rules Vt. power plant can stay open - 1/20   read more
+ N.J. man sentenced for failing to report Swiss bank accounts - 1/13   read more
+ Worker files complaint against Teamsters - 11/23   read more
+ BNY Mellon employee sentenced for embezzlement - 11/18   read more
+ US Airways loses appeal in Third Circuit - 11/18   read more
+ D.C. Court of Appeals upholds mandate provision of Obamacare - 11/8   read more
+ D.C. attorney general intervenes in 3M v. Lanny Davis - 11/8   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.