LegalNewsLine Logo  
Friday, February 10 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
State AGs 
story date  
Minnesota files lawsuits over two health insurance schemes
swanson.jpg
Lori Swanson (D)
ST. PAUL, Minn. (Legal Newsline) - Two lawsuits have been filed by Minnesota's attorney general against companies that allegedly scammed Minnesota citizens struggling with the high cost of health care.

The citizens were allegedly led to believe that they were purchasing health coverage at an affordable price. In actuality, what the citizens purchased were non-insurance products with limited benefits.

"Many people are struggling with skyrocketing health insurance premiums. Some companies are exploiting the lack of affordable health coverage by aggressively promoting risky, unregulated health coverage products that offer little or no financial protection if you get sick," Attorney General Lori Swanson said in a statement.

The companies -- Consumer Health Benefits Association, a non-profit corporation based in Missouri with its principal place of business in Florida, and Home Health America, LLC of Nevada -- seek out citizens in need of affordable coverage.

The lawsuits against the companies as well as Home Health America owner Michael Woodward seek injunctive relief, restitution for consumers and civil penalties. The owner of both companies has, in the past, had actions taken against them for similar conduct by other states.

Consumer Health Benefits Association is alleged to have targeted people in need of affordable health insurance by misleading them into paying a $129.90 enrollment fee as well as a monthly fee of $129.95 to $149.95.

The company misrepresented that it offered health insurance or a similar equivalent. Its "New Choice Health Plan" was misrepresented as insurance that would cover 80-percent of medical expense and required only minimum co-pays for doctor and hospital visits. The company also alleged that a vast network of doctors and hospitals provided coverage.

The plan, in actuality, does not provide insurance coverage or cover claims but purport to offer retail price discounts off of charges by certain doctors and clinics.

Health discount plans like Consumer Health Benefits Association, which are not licensed or regulated by the state, cannot legally assume the legal obligation for paying claims.

The company, which charged citizens a combined enrollment fee and monthly fee during the initial sales calls after obtaining a consumer's bank account information, only sent written materials of the plan after signing up the consumer. Within the first year of signing up, 94-percent of consumers canceled the plan.

The lawsuit alleges that Consumer Health Benefits Association violated the state's consumer fraud and deceptive trade practices laws. Previously, the company was sued by the Illinois attorney general's office in 2005. It agreed in a 2007 settlement not to represent that is plan was health insurance or commensurate to health insurance.

Health America is alleged to have sent elderly Minnesotans mailings that describe the high cost of home care and invited them to return a postcard for more information. Those who returned the postcard were called by defendant Michael Woodward under the pseudonym "Mike Woods."

Woodward requested to meet the seniors in their homes and, when doing so, told the consumer how home care and other long term care would be provided through Health America for a lump sum payment of between $3,000 and $4,000.

Woodward informed some senior citizens that the payment would cover one year of home care services. Others were told that the lump sum did not have any limited term.

Following their payments, the seniors would receive letters informing them that their program had been upgraded to include medical services including 24 hour nursing care and assisted living care.

The attorney general's office is not aware of any case where Health America paid claims in excess of the citizen's initial payment.

The lawsuit against Health America and Woodward alleges violations of the State's consumer fraud, deceptive trade practices, long-term care insurance and home solicitation laws.

Woodward had previously entered into a consent decree in 2006 with the state of Washington for a similar scheme. Woodward was prohibited under that consent decree from selling home health care contracts in Washington.

Filed Under: State AGs

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying - 2/10   read more
+ Blog: Mortgage settlement not all that great - 2/9   read more
+ Report: Va. AG sues over health spa memberships - 2/9   read more
+ N.H. AG settles with PetSmart over cadmium allegations - 2/9   read more
+ Conn. utilities board rules for Jepsen's motion - 2/9   read more
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside ... - 2/8   read more
+ La. AG hauls in $25.2M from five drug companies - 2/8   read more
+ Wells Fargo changes practices for handling subpoenas - 2/8   read more
+ Jepsen wants info from ValueAppeal - 2/8   read more
+ Ind. AG sues mortgage rescue companies - 2/8   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.