LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
State AGs 
story date  
Group of AGs noticeably missing from anti-preemption letter
mckernna.jpg
Rob McKenna (R)
clear
miller.jpg
Tom Miller (D)
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)-A group of 13 state attorneys general are absent from a sign-on letter sent last week to congressional leaders urging them not to preempt state consumer protection statutes.

It is noteworthy that the attorneys general did not sign the Nov. 4 letter since all but two of them opposed federal preemption of consumer protection laws in an amicus brief filed in a U.S. Supreme Court case last term, Cuomo v. The Clearing House Association.

The AGs' letter, organized by Republican Rob McKenna and Democrat Tom Miller of Iowa, urges Congress not to erode the states' role in consumer protection amid the proposed creation of a new federal Consumer Financial Protection Agency, which would, among other things, regulate mortgages and credit cards.

In their letter, the attorneys general said Congress should not preempt state banking and mortgage foreclosure laws if lawmakers create the new agency, which was called for by President Barack Obama.

"Rather than limiting the states' role in consumer financial protection, as some have advocated," the letter said, "we believe Congress should encourage an active and effective partnership between the states and federal financial regulatory agencies to the ultimate benefit of all consumers."

The states' chief legal officers who signed the letter say they should be able to enforce the proposed federal agency's regulations, allowing for a joint approach to protecting consumers. They also said they want to be able to enforce consumer protection laws for state- and federally-chartered financial institutions.

"Weakened consumer protections and limited enforcement authority already have damaged many consumers and the economy in general," the letter said. "Early state action can prevent a local problem from becoming a national one."

Of the 13 attorneys general, Democrats not signing onto the letter were: Beau Biden of Delaware, Jack Conway of Kentucky, Thurbert Baker of Georgia, Buddy Caldwell of Louisiana, Andrew Cuomo of New York and Drew Edmondson of Oklahoma.

Republicans not signing on the letter: Jon Bruning, president of the National Association of Attorneys General, which circulated the letter; and Alabama's Troy King, Indiana's Greg Zoeller, Pennsylvania's Tom Corbett, South Carolina's Henry McMaster, South Dakota's Marty Jackley and Wisconsin's J.B. Van Hollen.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a closely watched federal preemption case that state attorneys general have the authority to sue national banks.

In the case of Cuomo v. The Clearing House Association, all of the states' attorneys general urged the justices to overturn a 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have sole responsibility over banking investigations.

"The position of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency pushes the boundaries of preemption to new limits, thereby undermining the role that States play in our federal system," the AGs' brief said. "Unlike the state attorneys general, the OCC has no experience in enforcing state public protection laws, has a minimal track record in consumer protection, and has no accountability to the citizens of any state."

Siding with the AGs, the high court ruled that national banks are subject to some state laws under the National Banking Act. Because of that, the court said that attorneys general may seek a court's help to enforce those laws.

Attorneys general Zoeller and Jackley were not in office when the amicus brief was filed; their predecessors signed onto the document.

Legislation calling for the creation of a national consumer protection agency was introduced by U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, in July. The bill is H.R. 3126. The House Financial Services Committee voted 39-29 on Oct. 22 to pass the bill.

From Legal Newsline: Reach staff reporter Chris Rizo at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.


Filed Under: State AGs

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Okla. AG defends his decision not to join mortgage settlement - 2/10   read more
+ Payday lender ruled in contempt of Wis. settlement - 2/10   read more
+ Bill limiting Miss. AG's authority dead for breaking rules - 2/10   read more
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying - 2/10   read more
+ Madigan recovered more than $1M for workers in 2011 - 2/10   read more
+ Mass. AG recovered $5M from labor violations - 2/10   read more
+ Blog: Mortgage settlement not all that great - 2/9   read more
+ Report: Va. AG sues over health spa memberships - 2/9   read more
+ N.H. AG settles with PetSmart over cadmium allegations - 2/9   read more
+ Conn. utilities board rules for Jepsen's motion - 2/9   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.