LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
U.S. District Court 
story date  
Class action targets Wal-Mart's restocking practices
RICHMOND, Va. (Legal Newsline)-The mother of two young girls is suing Wal-Mart Stores Inc. for negligence and violating Virginias Consumer Protection Act, after her daughters were exposed to pornography.

In October, April Cortez and her husband went to Wal-Mart to purchase their 10- and 13-year-old daughters a video camera. They found one on sale and purchased it.

When they arrived home, their daughters were waiting so they handed them the package and let them open it. A few minutes later, the girls reportedly came crying to their mother.

Cortez then viewed the footage that had upset her daughters. Upon doing so, Cortez claims she too suffered immediate and severe emotional trauma from the pornographic images she saw on the camera.

Court papers say the couple sought professional help for their children but their insurance would not cover the costs.

The mother is suing Bentonville, Ark.-based Wal-Mart in a federal class action for violating Virginia's Consumer Protection Act by offering for sale returned goods without clearly indicating that the goods had been returned to the store by another customer.

"Wal-Mart maintains this policy of returning items to the shelf without disclosure of their true characteristics in order to increase its profits," attorney Matthey Erausqin of Consumer Litigation Associates wrote on behalf of his clients.

Cortez claims negligence, arguing the retailer had a duty to fully inspect returned items prior to returning them to the shelf for resale.

The lawsuit was filed this week in the Eastern Federal District of Virginia in Richmond.

Under the federal Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, federal courts have jurisdiction in the case because the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million.

Cortez is seeking statutory damages, attorneys fees and costs. She has demanded a jury trial.

Filed Under: U.S. District Court

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Report: Plan to speed up judicial nominations could be stalled - 2/9   read more
+ Fosomax case transferred to N.J. federal court - 2/3   read more
+ Law professor: Cordray appointment could affect judicial nominees - 1/23   read more
+ Federal judge rules Vt. power plant can stay open - 1/20   read more
+ N.J. man sentenced for failing to report Swiss bank accounts - 1/13   read more
+ Worker files complaint against Teamsters - 11/23   read more
+ BNY Mellon employee sentenced for embezzlement - 11/18   read more
+ US Airways loses appeal in Third Circuit - 11/18   read more
+ D.C. Court of Appeals upholds mandate provision of Obamacare - 11/8   read more
+ D.C. attorney general intervenes in 3M v. Lanny Davis - 11/8   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.