LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
Big Pharma 
story date  
Controversial Rendell suit named two other drug companies
rendell.jpg
Rendell
HARRISBURG, Pa. (Legal Newsline) - The original lawsuit filed by Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell through high-profile plaintiffs attorneys that is being challenged in state Supreme Court named two other prescription drug companies as defendants.

Eli Lilly & Co. and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals were also sued by Bailey Perrin Bailey, which was hired to represent Rendell's office, according to a complaint obtained by Legal Newsline. Janssen Pharmaceutica, the third defendant, has challenged the contingency fee agreement on which BPB was hired.

The case has made national news, as some have alleged it is an example of "pay-to-play." BPB donated $91,000 to Rendell's campaign in 2006.

Rendell set up a meeting between BPB and state Attorney General Tom Corbett, who refused to file BPB's lawsuit because he was unimpressed with the firm's evidence. Rendell then hired BPB to represent the Office of General Counsel.

The original complaint also lists Cohen, Placitella & Roth of Philadelphia and Robert Curran of Media, Pa., as counsel for the State.

Members of the Cohen firm contributed $5,000 to Rendell last year, as well as $7,000 to Corbett. Corbett is running for governor in 2010 and will have the option to keep pursuing the lawsuits should he be elected and they are still open.

An amicus brief submitted by the Washington Legal Foundation to the state Supreme Court calls the agreement "offensive to Commonwealth contracting policies" and says it "takes pay-to-play to new heights." Bailey contributed $75,000 directly to Rendell and $16,000 more in air travel. He also gave $25,000 to the Democratic Governors Association.

"The contract at issue here, effective in Nov. 2006, was awarded amidst a wave of unprecedented out-of-state political contributions by F. Kenneth Bailey," the brief says.

"In addition to more than $116,000 in campaign contributions from Mr. Bailey himself, the Governor's campaign committee in 2006 was the beneficiary of largess from Mr. Bailey's prior law firm - Williams & Bailey - which continued to use his name after he left, and from John E. Williams, Jr., the other name partner of that firm."

The brief says Williams contributed $25,000 to Rendell and provided $20,000 in air travel. The firm Williams & Bailey contributed $50,000 to Rendell.

"Should there be a recovery of the 'millions' of dollars that the complaint alleges are at issue, this apparent investment in Pennsylvania's pay-to-play political system would pay off most handsomely," the brief says.

Janssen is not challenging the campaign support but has made a note of them in its filings.

The case involves alleged off-label marketing of the prescription drug Risperdal. The Court will rule on:

-Whether Janssen lacks standing to seek the disqualification of BPB on the basis of alleged violations of constitutional law;

-Whether Rendell's office is allowed to enter into a contingent fee agreement with BPB;

-Whether BPB should be disqualified because the General Assembly did not authorize the contingent fee contract; and

-Whether BPB should be disqualified because it has a direct financial interest in the outcome of the litigation.

The original complaint against the three defendants was split. AstraZeneca's case concerns the drug Seroquel, while Eli Lilly's concerns the drug Zyprexa.

BPB is also representing Mississippi, Louisiana and Arkansas in Zyprexa litigation. They are three of the six remaining states with lawsuits that have not reached a settlement with Eli Lilly. Twelve states had held out of a 33-state settlement to pursue their own claims.

The firm recently suffered a setback in the Mississippi case when U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein granted the company summary judgment on most of the State's claims.

He called the lawsuit "a slash-and-burn style of litigation."

Eli Lilly spokesperson Marni Lemons recently said the Pennsylvania case is in a period of relative inactivity.

Rendell has defended hiring BPB.

"There wasn't the slightest bit of pay-to-play here," Rendell told the Philadelphia Inquirer. "I never put a dime of state money in jeopardy for Ken Bailey."

From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at jobrienwv@gmail.com.

Filed Under: Hot Topics

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Thirty-three states settle antitrust claims - 1/31   read more
+ UPDATE: Texas AG's Risperdal settlement worth $158M - 1/19   read more
+ Texas AG's Risperdal suit goes to trial - 1/10   read more
+ Texas, Actavis reach $84M settlement - 12/28   read more
+ Judge rules against GSK in Paxil mass tort - 12/19   read more
+ Miss. AWP settlements worth more than $6M - 10/24   read more
+ Pfizer settles over false Detrol claims - 10/21   read more
+ Digitek lawyers broke rules, attorney claims - 10/10   read more
+ Merck paying $1.6M in Idaho settlement - 9/29   read more
+ Three AGs reach $70M settlement with Watson - 9/16   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.