LegalNewsLine Logo  
Monday, May 21 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Second Circuit rules against NLRB in Starbucks case
+ Ind. AG files lawsuits against home loan modification companies
+ Three N.Y. union leaders guilty of racketeering, extortion
+ Thirty-one states join antitrust suit against Apple
+ Calif. AG, SC chief justice react to revised state budget
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
U.S. Supreme Court 
story date  
Firefighters finally get their promotions after U.S. Supreme Court victory
scotus.jpg
U.S. Supreme Court building
NEW HAVEN, Conn. (Legal Newsline)-The group of Connecticut firefighters who the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June were unfairly denied promotions because of their race received their promotions Thursday.

Twenty firefighters -- 19 white and one Hispanic -- who sued the city of New Haven, Conn., received their promotion badges at a formal ceremony.

They sued in 2004, after the city threw out their test scores on a promotional exam because no African-American candidate received a high enough score to also be considered for the same promotion.

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with the firefighters. Frank Ricci was the lead plaintiff in a landmark reverse discrimination case. He was promoted to lieutenant today.

For its part, the city had argued that allowing the test scores with such wide racial discrepancies could have violated federal law and opened the city to being sued by minority test-takers.

"Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer's reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions," Associate Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the high court's 5-4 majority.

At trial, U.S. District Judge Janet Bond Arterton in New Haven sided with the city, saying none of the plaintiffs were harmed since no one was promoted. She said the decision to disregard the test results affected all applicants equally.

"New Haven did not race-norm the scores (to favor minority candidates), they simply decided to start over," the judge said. "While the evidence shows that race was taken into account in the decision not to certify the test results, the result was race-neutral: all the test results were discarded."

A three-judge panel of the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision, and later refused a rehearing of the case.

The case was Ricci v. DeStefano, No. 07-1428.

In related news, the Connecticut Supreme Court on Wednesday overturned a $500,000 jury verdict in favor of two black firefighters who sued the city of New Haven after they were denied promotions. They said it was because of their race.

Chief Justice Chase Rogers wrote in the unanimous decision that there was insufficient evidence of discrimination against Lt. Christopher Texeira and retired Lt. John Brantley.

A state jury had awarded Brantley about $260,000 and Texeira about $251,000 in July 2005.

From Legal Newsline: Reach staff reporter Chris Rizo at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Mont. AG's brief to U.S. SC over election law due - 5/18   read more
+ U.S. SC denies challenge to New York City's rent control law - 4/24   read more
+ U.S. SC: Outside lawyers entitled to immunity for government work - 4/17   read more
+ U.S. SC won't hear Skilling case again - 4/17   read more
+ U.S. SC to decide if drug reps can receive overtime pay - 4/11   read more
+ Corporations fighting Mont. election law file petition with U.S. ... - 3/30   read more
+ U.S. SC asks if ObamaCare can work without mandate - 3/28   read more
+ W.Va. officials say redistricting ruling worth U.S. SC review - 3/28   read more
+ Justice Kennedy's statements analyzed after health care arguments - 3/27   read more
+ U.S. SC begins ObamaCare arguments - 3/26   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Friday, May 11, 2012
BATON ROUGE, La. (Legal Newsline) - A video has recently surfaced that shows a consultant advising a group of trial lawyers to find the defendants with deep pockets when pursuing a "legacy lawsuit."
Read more...


+ Defendants mount arguments for keeping Colossus in federal court - 5/8
+ Alaska AG says EPA's actions 'unlawful' - 4/30
+ U.S. SC won't take on torture case against Chevron - 4/27
+ Judge in Ark. Colossus class action did not 'play' - 4/25
+ Ark. jurisdiction battle an interesting one, professor says - 4/12
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.