LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
Asbestos 
story date  
Claims against Montana won't be stayed in asbestos case
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A temporary injunction staying asbestos claims against a bankrupt company will not be broadened to postpone claims against the State of Montana.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit made the ruling Dec. 31 in a case involving the bankruptcy of W.R. Grace, which is charged with harming the residents of Libby, Mont., by mining, processing and exporting asbestos-tainted vermiculite.

The federal government even charged the company with knowingly endangering the town, but W.R. Grace was acquitted May 8. In 2001, lawsuits against the company were stayed pending the outcome of the bankruptcy.

A class of Libby citizens wants to sue the State of Montana, claiming it should have warned the town of the asbestos-related dangers of the mine. The state Supreme Court agreed with the class and remanded the case to determine if the State had breached that duty.

Montana wanted the stay on Grace claims lifted so it could be named as a third-party defendants. Grace wanted the injunction expanded to include claims against the State.

In 2007, Grace's motion was denied, with the bankruptcy court writing, "Montana must first be found liable in state court and then pursue its claim for indemnification in bankruptcy court."

A Delaware district court and the Third Circuit agreed. The decision says subject-matter jurisdiction does not exist for the federal courts to expand the injunction to include state court actions against Montana.

"Grace will not be bound by any judgment against the third party in question," the decision says.

"Rather, an entirely separate action would be necessary for any liability incurred by Montana to have an impact on Grace's estate. Specifically, Montana would first have to be found liable by its state courts and would then have to successfully bring an indemnification or contribution claim against Grace in the Bankruptcy Court."

Judge Kent Jordan wrote the opinion. Judges Maryanne Trump Barry and D. Michael Fisher joined in hearing the issue.

From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at jobrienwv@gmail.com.

Filed Under: Hot Topics

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Owner renting websites to asbestos firms - 2/7   read more
+ Md. company proposes $19.5 million asbestos settlement - 2/2   read more
+ Ill. court will hear $17.8M asbestos appeal - 1/30   read more
+ Ohio House passes bill targeting asbestos trusts - 1/27   read more
+ Judge tells asbestos firm to hand over documents in fraud case - 1/27   read more
+ Calif. SC asbestos decision wrong, Motley Rice attorney says - 1/26   read more
+ Business groups in favor of change to Philly courts - 1/24   read more
+ Secrecy of asbestos trusts the topic of policy debate - 1/21   read more
+ Arguments scheduled in attorneys' appeal of fraud ruling - 1/17   read more
+ Calif. SC rules against theory in asbestos lawsuit - 1/12   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.