LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
U.S. Supreme Court 
story date  
U.S. justices nix water fight between Mississippi and Tennessee
scotus.jpg
U.S. Supreme Court building
JACKSON, Miss. (Legal Newsline)-The U.S. Supreme Court this week put an end to the water-rights battle between Mississippi and Tennessee.

The nation's highest court on Tuesday refused to hear the case, which emerged in 2005, after Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood filed a lawsuit against Memphis and its municipal utility, the Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division.

In his lawsuit, the Democratic attorney general claimed the city and its utility were taking too much water from an aquifer that lies beneath the neighboring states.

Among other things, Hood alleged that the Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division's wells caused water that had been beneath his state to flow into Memphis.

Hood originally filed his lawsuit in Oxford, Miss., but U.S. District Court Judge Glen Davidson ruled in 2008 that the Mississippi court lacked jurisdiction since it was a multistate dispute.

Davidson's ruling was upheld by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last June.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the case with no comment and rejected Mississippi's motion to file a new lawsuit before the high court.

Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Bill to televise U.S. SC passes committee - 2/9   read more
+ Coakley, Cuccinelli to debate health care law - 2/2   read more
+ Keep Fair Housing Act strong, AGs argue to U.S. SC - 2/1   read more
+ Supreme Court affirms federal preemption in Calif. case - 1/24   read more
+ 'Peter and the Wolf' must be paid - 1/24   read more
+ U.S. SC issues stay in W.Va. redistricting case - 1/23   read more
+ State Dept. files amicus favoring corporate liability - 1/23   read more
+ U.S. SC says federal court erred in drawing Texas redistricting p... - 1/20   read more
+ Supreme Court says telemarketing cases eligible for federal court... - 1/19   read more
+ U.S. SC approves nuisance call lawsuits for federal court - 1/18   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.