LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Man, startled by bottle rocket shot out of anus, sues frat
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
State AGs 
story date  
Suthers settles debt collection suit
suthers.jpg
Suthers
DENVER (Legal Newsline) - Colorado Attorney General John Suthers has reached a settlement with four law firms, three attorneys and one associated business barring them from violating the state's debt collection and consumer protection laws.

Wednesday, Suthers announced the settling of the lawsuit, which names attorneys Jack H. Boyajian, Marvin Brandon and Karen Nations as well as their four law firms and associated business.

Under terms of the settlement, Brandon is permanently banned from collecting debts in Colorado. Boyajian is enjoined from collecting debts in the state for five years and Nations is enjoined from collecting debts in the state for three years. If, following their respective bans, Boyajian or Nations wishes to resume debt collection in Colorado, they must obtain appropriate licenses from the state.

Boyajian and the corporate defendants are also required by the consent decree to pay the state $200,000 in costs and fees. Of that amount, $180,000 against Boyajian will be suspended if he pays the remaining $20,000 in a timely fashion.

The lawsuit against the attorneys and law firms was filed in July by Suthers' office. The lawsuit alleged that the firms and their principals were in violation of the Colorado Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Consumer Protection Act.

The primary business of the defendants concerned debts related to bounced checks, many of which had fallen outside of the statute of limitations and could not be the basis of legal action, Suthers said.

In some cases, fees were added by the defendants in excess of the amounts allowed by law, Suthers said, adding that penalties were also demanded. These fees, called "treble damages," may only be assessed following a successful lawsuit.

The defendants and their businesses were also suspected of using law firm letterhead when sending out collection letters without them being reviewed by an attorney.

Each of the law firms in the state's lawsuit had been incorporated in California and held principal offices in New Jersey. None of the three attorneys in the lawsuit was licensed to practice in Colorado. All of the law firms and the associated business are now defunct or no longer doing business in Colorado.

Filed Under: State AGs

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Okla. AG defends his decision not to join mortgage settlement - 2/10   read more
+ Payday lender ruled in contempt of Wis. settlement - 2/10   read more
+ Bill limiting Miss. AG's authority dead for breaking rules - 2/10   read more
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying - 2/10   read more
+ Madigan recovered more than $1M for workers in 2011 - 2/10   read more
+ Mass. AG recovered $5M from labor violations - 2/10   read more
+ Blog: Mortgage settlement not all that great - 2/9   read more
+ Report: Va. AG sues over health spa memberships - 2/9   read more
+ N.H. AG settles with PetSmart over cadmium allegations - 2/9   read more
+ Conn. utilities board rules for Jepsen's motion - 2/9   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.