LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Role of plaintiffs lawyers in Dodd-Frank debated at House hearing
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
State Supreme Courts 
story date  
S.C. justices overturn $18M Ford verdict
toal.jpg
Toal
COLUMBIA, S.C. (Legal Newsline) - The South Carolina Supreme Court has struck down an $18 million verdict against Ford, finding that an expert for the plaintiffs wasn't much of an expert.

Monday, the justices discredited the testimony of Bill Williams, an electrical engineer who claimed electromagnetic radiation interfered with the Ford Explorer driven by Sonya Watson during a 1999 crash that killed Patricia Carter.

Watson became a quadriplegic.

"In our view, there is no evidence to support the trial court's qualification of Williams as an expert in cruise control systems," Justice Jean Toal wrote.

"Williams had no knowledge, skill, experience, training or education specifically related to cruise control systems. Rather, it appears he merely studied the Explorer's system just before trial, which he indicated in his testimony to the jury: 'This is how I taught myself the (Explorer's) cruise control, or speed control system.'

"While Williams may have been qualified as an expert in other aspects of automobile components, such as the brake system, the trial court failed to properly evaluate Williams' qualifications specific to cruise control systems."

The Supreme Court also ruled that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of Dr. Antony Anderson, an electrical engineer from Britain.

He testified that electromagnetic interference can interfere with the speed control component of a cruise control system and cause a vehicle to unexpectedly and uncontrollably accelerate.

Watson said her Explorer did just that, causing her crash.

The court said Anderson's testimony lacked any scientific basis.

"Dr. Anderson's background involved working with massive generators which have entirely different electrical wiring systems and different voltage levels," Toal wrote.

"He had no experience in the automobile industry, never studied a cruise control system, and never designed any component of a cruise control system."

From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at jobrienwv@gmail.com.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ W.Va. SC says city can't be sued for injuries at trash station - 2/10   read more
+ S.C. chief justice says courts essential to economic development - 2/9   read more
+ Pa. SC won't meddle with Philly forum-shopping - 2/2   read more
+ D.C. high court tackles government contacts principle - 2/2   read more
+ Conn. SC: Physician's opinion in med mal case detailed enough - 2/1   read more
+ Ark. SC rules clerk's signature on summons was valid - 2/1   read more
+ Miss. SC reverses part of decision in underwriting case - 2/1   read more
+ Mo. SC upholds cap on punitive damages - 1/31   read more
+ Del. SC says firm's fee must be deducted before lien - 1/31   read more
+ Md. high court: Allergy is a handicap - 1/31   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.