LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Role of plaintiffs lawyers in Dodd-Frank debated at House hearing
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
Asbestos 
story date  
Calif. appeals court: Blaming Navy for asbestos is OK
SAN FRANCISCO (Legal Newsline) - Blame can be placed on the U.S. Navy for asbestos exposure, a California appeals court ruled Thursday.

The decision came after one of 17 entities that could have been ordered to pay a percentage of damages in an asbestos lawsuit appealed the exclusion of the Navy. Ulysses Collins died in 2005 of mesothelioma and worked in naval shipyards from 1960-73 and 1976-94.

A jury allocated 20 percent of fault to Plant Insulation Company, which appealed to the state First District Court of Appeals. The overall verdict is worth $10 million.

"Plant argues the Navy's immunity is essentially one from suit and does not mean the service owes no duty of care as to its enlisted personnel and civilian employees and thus cannot be characterized as a 'tortfeasor' for purposes of Proposition 51," the decision says.

"Plaintiffs contend sovereign immunity is based on the historical adage 'the King can do no wrong' and therefore the Navy's actions cannot be 'wrongful' and thus no 'fault' can be allocated to the service.

"We agree with Plant and conclude the Navy is properly included among those entities to which fault may be apportioned in an asbestos case."

Attorney Mark Behrens of Shook Hardy & Bacon said having the Navy on the verdict form is "significant."

"My understanding is that Collins was an outlier and that most California courts have listed the Navy on verdict sheets in asbestos cases," Behrens said.

"The appellate court's decision thus settles the practice and prevents other trial courts from going awry in the future."

Fifteen percent of blame was attributed to Fibreboard, 5 percent to Chevron/Standard Oil, 30 percent to Owens-Corning Fiberglas/FENCO/Kaylo, and 30 percent to Johns-Manville/Western Asbestos/Western MacArthur.

The court wrote the Navy is "immune from liability" in the case because of an exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act that bars actions based on the federal government's alleged negligence in using asbestos on ships.

From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at jobrienwv@gmail.com.




Filed Under: Hot Topics

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Owner renting websites to asbestos firms - 2/7   read more
+ Md. company proposes $19.5 million asbestos settlement - 2/2   read more
+ Ill. court will hear $17.8M asbestos appeal - 1/30   read more
+ Ohio House passes bill targeting asbestos trusts - 1/27   read more
+ Judge tells asbestos firm to hand over documents in fraud case - 1/27   read more
+ Calif. SC asbestos decision wrong, Motley Rice attorney says - 1/26   read more
+ Business groups in favor of change to Philly courts - 1/24   read more
+ Secrecy of asbestos trusts the topic of policy debate - 1/21   read more
+ Arguments scheduled in attorneys' appeal of fraud ruling - 1/17   read more
+ Calif. SC rules against theory in asbestos lawsuit - 1/12   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.