LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Role of plaintiffs lawyers in Dodd-Frank debated at House hearing
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
State Supreme Courts 
story date  
Okla. SC rules fee unconstitutional
OKLAHOMA CITY (Legal Newsline) - The Oklahoma Supreme Court has overturned a controversial health claims fee, ruling it unconstitutional on Tuesday.

Last month, state Insurance Commissioner Kim Holland filed a lawsuit that asked the court to decide whether a 1 percent fee on health insurance plans was a tax.

A revenue-generating measure must have three-fourths of the Legislature's vote to pass. House Bill 2437, which created the fee, did not get approval by three-fourths of all lawmakers.

The fee was passed in the waning days of Oklahoma's legislative session and was expected to generate $78 million a year. The money would have helped fund the state's Medicaid program.

The fee would have been charged to employers who fund health insurance plans for their employees. Employers would have paid 1 percent of their total amount of claims paid. The fee was to take effect on Friday.

Now, additional federal stimulus dollars allocated to the state this summer will offset the loss of money expected to be generated by the fee, according to The Oklahoman.

Lawmakers also will have to figure out to how to pay for the state's portion of the Medicaid program when crafting the budget for the 2012 fiscal year.

"We do not see a reason to panic at this point," Mike Fogarty, chief executive officer of the Oklahoma Health Care Authority, told the Oklahoman. "Since the Oklahoma Legislature adjourned in May, the federal government has made additional funds available to states."

The extension of federal dollars is expected to make an additional $140 million to $150 million available to help fund the state's Medicaid program, which provides health care to low-income people, The Oklahoman reported.

State Treasurer Scott Meacham told the newspaper the federal dollars are easing the effect of the Supreme Court's decision.

"The stimulus is kind of saving us on this deal," Meacham said. "Where it hurts us is the long run, down the line in maintaining the program there."

Most of the funds were originally set aside for the state's Insure Oklahoma program, which helps small business owners purchase health insurance for employees.

"That means we're not going to be able to take in as many uninsured people into the program and provide them with health insurance," Meacham told The Oklahoman.

Six of the nine justices ruled that the legislation created a new tax and violated provisions of the state constitution that require a revenue generating bill to receive three-fourths support from the House and Senate. State law also prohibits revenue bills from being passed in the last five days of session.

All nine justices heard oral arguments and quizzed attorneys in the case on Monday.

Earlier this month, the high court denied a request from the state's Chamber of Commerce to join in the lawsuit protesting the 1 percent fee.

The court, in its order, denied a request by the state Chamber to submit an amicus brief. The Chamber had argued that the 1,282 businesses it represents would be directly impacted.

From Legal Newsline: Reach Jessica Karmasek by e-mail at jessica@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ W.Va. SC says city can't be sued for injuries at trash station - 2/10   read more
+ S.C. chief justice says courts essential to economic development - 2/9   read more
+ Pa. SC won't meddle with Philly forum-shopping - 2/2   read more
+ D.C. high court tackles government contacts principle - 2/2   read more
+ Conn. SC: Physician's opinion in med mal case detailed enough - 2/1   read more
+ Ark. SC rules clerk's signature on summons was valid - 2/1   read more
+ Miss. SC reverses part of decision in underwriting case - 2/1   read more
+ Mo. SC upholds cap on punitive damages - 1/31   read more
+ Del. SC says firm's fee must be deducted before lien - 1/31   read more
+ Md. high court: Allergy is a handicap - 1/31   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.