LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, February 12 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Vermont GOP wants Sorrell to look into possible union bullying
+ Hood critical of bill that would allow officials to hire outside attorneys
+ More than 40 states have signed on to proposed mortgage deal
+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts
+ Role of plaintiffs lawyers in Dodd-Frank debated at House hearing
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
U.S. District Court 
story date  
Feds say states can't challenge part of health care reform
mccollum.jpg
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum is one of the state officials challenging health care reform.
PENSACOLA, Fla. (Legal Newsline) - The federal government says the mandate requiring individuals to purchase health insurance included in health care reform is constitutional and states may not challenge it.

That argument came in support of the feds' motion to dismiss a lawsuit in which 21 states are challenging the reform package signed into law in March. The states wrote earlier this month in a response to the federal government's motion to dismiss that the mandate is an "unprecedented intrusion" on the freedoms of states and their citizens.

The mandate forces individuals to buy health insurance or face a $695 annual penalty and goes into effect in 2014.

"Defendants' opening brief explained how plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate actual or imminent injury from a provision that will not go into effect for several years," the federal government wrote Friday.

"As neither side can know the future, Plaintiffs' response seeks to shift to Defendants the burden of proof."

The states, as well as the National Federation of Independent Business, say it is wrong to penalize an individual for not participating in a marketplace.

The feds say the Anti-Injunction Act bars the challenge even if the court determines the mandate is a tax.

"Congress' conclusion that the minimum coverage requirement is integral to the functioning of the health insurance markets rests on legislative judgments that command great deference," they say.

"Congress found that, before (health care reform), uninsured individuals, as a class, shifted billions of dollars of health care costs each year to other participants in the health care market including providers, insurers, governments and, ultimately, their fellow citizens."

The feds also respond to the language used in the states' response to the motion to dismiss. The states said the provisions in the reform package "transform our nation beyond recognition" and "arm Congress with unbridled top-down control over virtually every aspect of persons' lives."

The feds say such phrasing "signal(s) the political rather than legal nature of Plaintiffs' claims."

From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at jobrienwv@gmail.com.

Filed Under: U.S. District Court

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Report: Plan to speed up judicial nominations could be stalled - 2/9   read more
+ Fosomax case transferred to N.J. federal court - 2/3   read more
+ Law professor: Cordray appointment could affect judicial nominees - 1/23   read more
+ Federal judge rules Vt. power plant can stay open - 1/20   read more
+ N.J. man sentenced for failing to report Swiss bank accounts - 1/13   read more
+ Worker files complaint against Teamsters - 11/23   read more
+ BNY Mellon employee sentenced for embezzlement - 11/18   read more
+ US Airways loses appeal in Third Circuit - 11/18   read more
+ D.C. Court of Appeals upholds mandate provision of Obamacare - 11/8   read more
+ D.C. attorney general intervenes in 3M v. Lanny Davis - 11/8   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
garrett.jpg
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
PHILADELPHIA (Legal Newsline) - A roundtable of federal and state judges from across the country will convene at the posh Ritz Carlton on Feb. 9 to address topics such as "Can MDL's keep up with state court trial settings;" "Priority of deposition examination;" "State and federal cooperation;" and "Forum non conveniens."
Read more...


+ Study shows plaintiff bias in Philly courts - 2/6
+ Fannie Mae offers examples of routine dishonesty in its fight against lenders - 2/3
+ Quaker City courts have troubled history; some reject 'plaintiff-friendly' criticism - 1/31
+ Madison County asbestos docket feeds off intake firm referrals - 1/19
+ Torts conference set for Feb. 8 in Philly - 1/18
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.