LegalNewsLine Logo  
Tuesday, May 22 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Ind. AG files lawsuits against home loan modification companies
+ Mich. SC justice under scrutiny for real estate transactions
+ Verizon employee settles with employer, union
+ Seventh Circuit slams door on shareholder lawsuit against Zimmer
+ SEC charges N.J. man with real estate investment scam
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Labor Issues
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
Tobacco 
story date  
Mo. judge declares mistrial in tobacco lawsuit
ST. LOUIS (Legal Newsline) - A St. Louis jury on Tuesday failed to return a verdict in a class action case against Philip Morris USA over whether smokers were deceived into believing "light" and low-tar cigarettes reduced health hazards.

As a result, St. Louis Circuit Judge Michael David declared a mistrial in the $700 million lawsuit against the cigarette maker.

"After 11 years of pre-trial proceedings and a month and a half of testimony, today's mistrial shows that the plaintiffs failed to convince a jury of their claims," Murray Garnick, Altria Client Services senior vice president and associate general counsel, speaking on behalf of Philip Morris, said in a statement Tuesday.

"We continue to believe that these claims are baseless and today's mistrial shows that we have powerful defenses in these 'lights' cases."

According to the lawsuit, originally filed in February 2000, plaintiffs alleged that Philip Morris violated Missouri's Merchandising Practices Act by using the terms "lights" and "lowered tar and nicotine" on packages of Marlboro Lights.

The plaintiffs sought recovery of a portion of the money paid by Missouri residents who purchased the cigarettes from 1995 to 2003.

Garnick said the company believes the class should never have been certified.

"All federal courts and seven state courts have refused to certify these types of cases as class actions recognizing that there are too many individual issues to make these a workable class action," he said.

Meanwhile, plaintiffs attorney Stephen Swedlow told The Associated Press he plans to take the case to trial again.

The Missouri case isn't the only one the cigarette maker is facing over the "light" labeling.

In Illinois last month, the state Supreme Court declined review of an appellate court's decision allowing plaintiffs to ask a lower court to re-open a case against Philip Morris.

According to a 70-page disposition, the Court denied the company's petition for leave to appeal.

Garnick said last month the high court's decision simply means that the plaintiffs are allowed to present their petition to the trial court.

He said Philip Morris looks forward to presenting its arguments about why state law makes it clear the plaintiffs cannot re-open the case.

From Legal Newsline: Reach Jessica Karmasek by email at jessica@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: Hot Topics

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Attorney says $10.1B tobacco award must be reinstated - 4/20   read more
+ Fla. court says $79M tobacco award too much - 4/10   read more
+ Cigarette warning labels a danger to all industries, groups say - 4/9   read more
+ Philip Morris says no relief owed in suit over light cigarettes - 3/30   read more
+ Graphic warnings on cigarettes to be argued in April - 3/27   read more
+ U.S. SC allows $28.3M tobacco verdict to stand - 3/26   read more
+ Sixth Circuit upholds graphic warning labels on cigarette packs - 3/20   read more
+ Judge: FDA's new cigarette warnings violate First Amendment - 2/29   read more
+ Sixth Circuit upholds national tobacco agreement - 2/24   read more
+ Mo. AG says tobacco payment loophole causing big problems - 2/2   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
livermore.jpg
Monday, May 21, 2012
NEW YORK (Legal Newsline) - A think tank affiliated with New York University School of Law has issued a report that "takes aim at the confusing debate over jobs and environmental regulation."
Read more...


+ Controversial presentation on creating 'legacy lawsuits' uncovered - 5/11
+ Defendants mount arguments for keeping Colossus in federal court - 5/8
+ Alaska AG says EPA's actions 'unlawful' - 4/30
+ U.S. SC won't take on torture case against Chevron - 4/27
+ Judge in Ark. Colossus class action did not 'play' - 4/25
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.