LegalNewsLine Logo  
Wednesday, May 23 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Mich. SC justice under scrutiny for real estate transactions
+ Seventh Circuit slams door on shareholder lawsuit against Zimmer
+ Verizon employee settles with employer, union
+ SEC charges N.J. man with real estate investment scam
+ Federal judge refuses to dismiss Chevron RICO lawsuit
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Labor Issues
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
State Courts 
story date  
AIG wants judge to toss $58M verdict
CLARKSBURG, W.Va. (Legal Newsline) - Chartis and AIG plan to ask a Harrison County, W.Va., judge to toss a $58 million jury verdict from earlier this month involving a leaking tank at a gas station.

On Tuesday, a Harrison Circuit Court jury awarded $58 million to the owners of a Hess Oil gas station in Mount Storm. That included $5 million in compensatory damages and $53 million in punitive damages. This Hess Oil is not the large national company, rather a small local one.

The story begins more than a decade ago when the owners of the gas station discovered an oil spill near the station in 1998. Legal action followed, including litigation about the environmental cleanup company.

AIG had a policy with the plaintiffs and began to pay coverage when the leaking tank was reported. There was a $1 million limit on the policy, and about $900,000 was paid out. Then, AIG apparently learned the event that triggered the claim occurred before the station was covered under the policy.

Michael J. Romano, a Clarksburg attorney who represented the plaintiffs, told businessinsurance.com that the Chartis units -- Commerce & Industry Insurance Co. and Chartis Claims Inc. - claim Hess Oil misrepresented the facts in its 1997 insurance application and that the company "duped" Chartis. Romano denies that assertion.

Before the trial, Chartis offered a $100,000 settlement that Romano's clients rejected because they "felt they need to be vindicated," Mr. Romano told the website.

But, Chartis and AIG now want their own vindication.

They are asking the judge "to set aside a clearly erroneous jury verdict that awards compensatory damages unsupported by the facts and law and punitive damages that are clearly excessive and unjustifiable," the companies said in a statement. "The inarguable fact is we paid out 90 percent of the limits of the policy over a decade's worth of cleanup to a policyholder who did not provide us with material information when it took out its policy.

"The facts, law and justice do not support the jury's verdict."

Filed Under: State Courts

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Pa. starting new procedures for 'cy pres' funds - 5/14   read more
+ Ill. appellate court upholds O'Malley in forum decision - 5/4   read more
+ Calif. court to cut staff, close courtrooms in wake of budget cri... - 4/19   read more
+ Calif. SC chief justice, others speak on effect of budget cuts - 4/17   read more
+ Calif. appeals court overturns $603 million verdict against Boein... - 4/16   read more
+ Judge declares Minn. unionization order unconstitutional - 4/12   read more
+ Physicians groups want Calif. SC to review anesthetists case - 4/9   read more
+ Texas jury: TaxMasters and CEO must pay $195 million - 4/2   read more
+ Coalition challenges Conn. governor on labor issue - 4/2   read more
+ Calif. SC chief justice talks budget challenges in address - 3/20   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
livermore.jpg
Monday, May 21, 2012
NEW YORK (Legal Newsline) - A think tank affiliated with New York University School of Law has issued a report that "takes aim at the confusing debate over jobs and environmental regulation."
Read more...


+ Controversial presentation on creating 'legacy lawsuits' uncovered - 5/11
+ Defendants mount arguments for keeping Colossus in federal court - 5/8
+ Alaska AG says EPA's actions 'unlawful' - 4/30
+ U.S. SC won't take on torture case against Chevron - 4/27
+ Judge in Ark. Colossus class action did not 'play' - 4/25
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.