LegalNewsLine Logo  
Wednesday, May 23 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Mich. SC justice under scrutiny for real estate transactions
+ Seventh Circuit slams door on shareholder lawsuit against Zimmer
+ Verizon employee settles with employer, union
+ SEC charges N.J. man with real estate investment scam
+ Federal judge refuses to dismiss Chevron RICO lawsuit
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Labor Issues
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
Asbestos 
story date  
Arguments scheduled in attorneys' appeal of fraud ruling
HOUSTON (Legal Newsline) - Asbestos attorneys found to have committed fraud against a railroad company will argue their case to a federal appeals court on March 6.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided on that date on Monday. In its lawsuit, Illinois Central Railroad Company alleged plaintiffs attorneys William Guy and Thomas Brock, both of Mississippi, did not disclose its clients' previous involvements in another asbestos lawsuit.

Oral arguments will be heard in the morning session that the Fifth Circuit is holding at the University of Houston Law Center. It is believed to be the first time a jury found that asbestos plaintiffs lawyers committed fraud.

Illinois Central's complaints alleged the company would not have been obligated to pay $210,000 in settlements had it known that Willie Harried joined a mass action, titled Cosey, in 1995 and Warren Turner in 1996.

Harried and Turner both filed suit against Illinois Central in 2001. The complaints say Guy and Brock knew their clients had taken part in the mass action and failed to disclose it. A federal jury agreed and awarded the company $420,000.

Guy and Brock say the district court had no jurisdiction over the case and that the company did not file the fraud lawsuit against them until the statute of limitations had tolled. They add the company disclosed that it knew about the alleged harm by Feb. 13, 2004, while investigating possible fraud in another mass action, yet did not inform them.

The lawsuit was filed Jan. 31, 2007, against Turner, and the attorneys were added as defendants later that year.

Also at issue is the award of $500,000 in attorneys fees to Illinois Central. The company had asked for close to $1 million, but a judge ruled that was excessive. The company has lost money while pursuing the case.

From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at jobrienwv@gmail.com.

Filed Under: Hot Topics

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Del. judge disgusted with bankruptcy trust secrecy - 5/23   read more
+ Calif. court rules against woman exposed to asbestos while doing ... - 5/22   read more
+ La. committee to debate asbestos trust bill - 5/22   read more
+ Dem. Congressman calls attorneys who contacted him 'parasites' - 5/11   read more
+ Subcommittee to weigh asbestos trust bill - 5/10   read more
+ Fraud case will continue against asbestos firm - 5/8   read more
+ Calif. court affirms asbestos award, calls company 'reprehensible... - 5/2   read more
+ Second Circuit: Pfizer lost protection against asbestos suits - 4/19   read more
+ CSX given discovery orders in racketeering case against firm - 4/19   read more
+ Bipartisan bill would bring change to asbestos lawsuits - 4/18   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
livermore.jpg
Monday, May 21, 2012
NEW YORK (Legal Newsline) - A think tank affiliated with New York University School of Law has issued a report that "takes aim at the confusing debate over jobs and environmental regulation."
Read more...


+ Controversial presentation on creating 'legacy lawsuits' uncovered - 5/11
+ Defendants mount arguments for keeping Colossus in federal court - 5/8
+ Alaska AG says EPA's actions 'unlawful' - 4/30
+ U.S. SC won't take on torture case against Chevron - 4/27
+ Judge in Ark. Colossus class action did not 'play' - 4/25
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.