LegalNewsLine Logo  
Wednesday, May 23 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Mich. SC justice under scrutiny for real estate transactions
+ Seventh Circuit slams door on shareholder lawsuit against Zimmer
+ Verizon employee settles with employer, union
+ SEC charges N.J. man with real estate investment scam
+ Federal judge refuses to dismiss Chevron RICO lawsuit
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Labor Issues
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
U.S. Supreme Court 
story date  
AGs file brief in support of ObamaCare
gansler.png
Gansler
BALTIMORE (Legal Newsline) - Attorneys general from 14 states and territories on Friday filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the federal health care law.

Maryland Attorney General Doug Gansler joined attorneys general from the Virgin Islands, the District of Columbia, Vermont, Oregon, New York, New Mexico, Iowa, Illinois, Hawaii, Delaware, Connecticut and California in filing the brief as amicus curiae to support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

"The Affordable Care Act is vital for states seeking to battle spiraling health care costs and gaps in coverage for those who need critical care," Gansler said.

"Just as Congress can legally require truck drivers to purchase liability insurance, workers to contribute to Social Security, send our children off to war, or file an income tax return every April, so can Congress require the purchase of health insurance. As every state knows all too well, health care in America is in crisis and requires a national solution."

The brief was filed in HHS v. Florida, which focuses on the constitutionality of the act's provision of minimum coverage. According to the brief, the provision is unquestionably constitutional under the Commerce Clause because it addresses a major health care crisis that is both fundamentally interstate in nature and has major effects on interstate commerce.

The amici states have made major efforts to address the cause, but write that state-by-state efforts cannot completely counteract the force of nationwide trends pushed by interstate problems.

The amici states argue that the provisions of the act are completely consistent with the intent of the Commerce Clause, which enables Congress to attack interstate problems that have major economic impacts.

The brief also argues that the provisions of the act allow states to focus their resources on urgent healthcare needs within their borders and gives them freedom to do so through setting up waivers, exchanges and more. In these ways, the act can grow the success of cooperative federalism in which states participate jointly with the federal government to build lasting solutions to problems on a national level.

In September, the National Federation of Independent Business, along with 26 states, filed petitions to make their legal challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act heard in the U.S. Supreme Court. The act was signed into law by President Barack Obama in March 2010.

They challenge a mandate that requires individuals to purchase health insurance or face a $695 penalty. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled the mandate unconstitutional, though other circuits decided the opposite.

Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Group of states file brief to U.S. SC to uphold Mont. election la... - 5/21   read more
+ Mont. AG's brief to U.S. SC over election law due - 5/18   read more
+ U.S. SC denies challenge to New York City's rent control law - 4/24   read more
+ U.S. SC: Outside lawyers entitled to immunity for government work - 4/17   read more
+ U.S. SC won't hear Skilling case again - 4/17   read more
+ U.S. SC to decide if drug reps can receive overtime pay - 4/11   read more
+ Corporations fighting Mont. election law file petition with U.S. ... - 3/30   read more
+ U.S. SC asks if ObamaCare can work without mandate - 3/28   read more
+ W.Va. officials say redistricting ruling worth U.S. SC review - 3/28   read more
+ Justice Kennedy's statements analyzed after health care arguments - 3/27   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
livermore.jpg
Monday, May 21, 2012
NEW YORK (Legal Newsline) - A think tank affiliated with New York University School of Law has issued a report that "takes aim at the confusing debate over jobs and environmental regulation."
Read more...


+ Controversial presentation on creating 'legacy lawsuits' uncovered - 5/11
+ Defendants mount arguments for keeping Colossus in federal court - 5/8
+ Alaska AG says EPA's actions 'unlawful' - 4/30
+ U.S. SC won't take on torture case against Chevron - 4/27
+ Judge in Ark. Colossus class action did not 'play' - 4/25
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.