LegalNewsLine Logo  
Wednesday, May 23 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Mich. SC justice under scrutiny for real estate transactions
+ Seventh Circuit slams door on shareholder lawsuit against Zimmer
+ Verizon employee settles with employer, union
+ SEC charges N.J. man with real estate investment scam
+ Federal judge refuses to dismiss Chevron RICO lawsuit
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Labor Issues
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
U.S. Supreme Court 
story date  
Supreme Court says telemarketing cases eligible for federal courts
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Supreme Court says lawsuits by private persons for violation of the "Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA)" can be heard in federal courts.

The Jan. 18 ruling reversed one by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Mims v Arrow Finanical Services LLC.

The TCPA prohibits cer­tain invasive telemarketing practices and authorizes regulation by the Federal Com­munications Commission (FCC). It also directs States to bring civil actions to stop the prohibited practices and recover damages on their residents' behalf. The jurisdiction over these state-initiated suits lies exclusively in the U. S. district courts, The TCPA also permits a private person to seek redress for viola­tions "in an appropriate court of [a] State," "if [such an action is] otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of court of [that] State."

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed Mims's actions because of sub­ject-matter jurisdiction. It concluded that the TCPA said only state courts juris­diction over private actions.

The USSC held that "the TCPA's permissive grant of jurisdiction to state courts does not deprive the U. S. district courts of federal-question jurisdiction over private TCPA suits."

Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Group of states file brief to U.S. SC to uphold Mont. election la... - 5/21   read more
+ Mont. AG's brief to U.S. SC over election law due - 5/18   read more
+ U.S. SC denies challenge to New York City's rent control law - 4/24   read more
+ U.S. SC: Outside lawyers entitled to immunity for government work - 4/17   read more
+ U.S. SC won't hear Skilling case again - 4/17   read more
+ U.S. SC to decide if drug reps can receive overtime pay - 4/11   read more
+ Corporations fighting Mont. election law file petition with U.S. ... - 3/30   read more
+ U.S. SC asks if ObamaCare can work without mandate - 3/28   read more
+ W.Va. officials say redistricting ruling worth U.S. SC review - 3/28   read more
+ Justice Kennedy's statements analyzed after health care arguments - 3/27   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
livermore.jpg
Monday, May 21, 2012
NEW YORK (Legal Newsline) - A think tank affiliated with New York University School of Law has issued a report that "takes aim at the confusing debate over jobs and environmental regulation."
Read more...


+ Controversial presentation on creating 'legacy lawsuits' uncovered - 5/11
+ Defendants mount arguments for keeping Colossus in federal court - 5/8
+ Alaska AG says EPA's actions 'unlawful' - 4/30
+ U.S. SC won't take on torture case against Chevron - 4/27
+ Judge in Ark. Colossus class action did not 'play' - 4/25
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.