LegalNewsLine Logo  
Wednesday, May 23 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Mich. SC justice under scrutiny for real estate transactions
+ Seventh Circuit slams door on shareholder lawsuit against Zimmer
+ Verizon employee settles with employer, union
+ SEC charges N.J. man with real estate investment scam
+ Federal judge refuses to dismiss Chevron RICO lawsuit
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Labor Issues
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
Asbestos 
story date  
Ill. court will hear $17.8M asbestos appeal
wylder.jpg
Wylder
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (Legal Newsline) - Illinois Fourth District appellate judges will review a $17.8 million jury verdict from a McLean County asbestos conspiracy trial at oral arguments on Feb. 7.

Odds run long against Bloomington conspiracy lawyers James Wylder and Lisa Corwin, who lost two verdicts on appeal last year.

In the current case, jurors awarded Jayne Menssen punitive damages of $10 million against Honeywell International and $4.3 million against Pneumo-Abex.

They awarded $3.5 million in compensatory damages against each defendant.

Menssen, a secretary at Union Asbestos and Rubber Company in Bloomington from 1967 to 1969, contracted mesothelioma.

She blamed Honeywell for her disease as successor to brake maker Bendix, and Abex as successor to American Brake and Block.

Jurors found Bendix and Abex conspired with her employer and other companies to suppress information about the hazards of asbestos.

Former circuit judge Michael Prall entered the verdict, prior to his retirement.

Wylder has staged a series of conspiracy trials featuring testimony from author Barry Castleman about events that happened 50 to 100 years ago.

A conspiracy theory allows Wylder to shift liability from bankrupt asbestos producers like Johns-Manville to solvent companies.

Fourth District precedents sustained the conspiracy theory, until last year.

At oral argument on a $2.5 million verdict last April, Justice John Turner asked Wylder if Honeywell was part of the group that employed authors of the first asbestos study.

Wylder said no.

Turner asked if Bendix took part in suppression of a second study, and Wylder said no.

For Honeywell, Coleen Baime of Chicago said Circuit Judge Scott Drazewski excluded evidence that other companies engaged in similar conduct.

"A false world was created," Baime said.

"It was the way everybody did it at the time."

She said Drazewski allowed Wylder to present circumstantial evidence while excluding Honeywell from rebutting it.

She said punitive damages exacerbated the error.

Turner and Justices John McCullough and Thomas Appleton reversed the verdict in July, expressly abandoning Fourth District precedents.

Appleton wrote that companies didn't have to publish a report on tumors in mice 60 years ago, because the author told the companies it meant nothing.

"It cannot be unlawful to hide information that is devoid of significance," Appleton wrote.

He wrote that the mouse research meant nothing because it lacked controls.

A different Fourth District panel reversed another verdict on Dec. 23, finding Drazewski should have rejected a $5.5 million against Honeywell.

Justice James Knecht wrote that there was no evidence Bendix agreed with any other corporation to falsely assert asbestos was safe or to keep quiet about its dangers.

"The evidence must be clear and convincing if a conspiracy is to be proved solely by circumstantial evidence," Knecht wrote.

"The fact Johns-Manville was the exclusive supplier of asbestos fiber to Bendix for many decades does not support the inference Bendix and Johns-Manville entered into an agreement to conceal the dangers of asbestos."

Appleton and Justice Robert Steigmann concurred.

They abandoned the same precedents the previous panel abandoned.

As of Thursday, Fourth District judges hadn't identified the Feb. 7 panel.

A $90 million verdict, the biggest in 30 years of McLean County asbestos litigation, remains pending at the Fourth District.

Filed Under: Hot Topics

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Calif. court rules against woman exposed to asbestos while doing ... - 5/22   read more
+ La. committee to debate asbestos trust bill - 5/22   read more
+ Dem. Congressman calls attorneys who contacted him 'parasites' - 5/11   read more
+ Subcommittee to weigh asbestos trust bill - 5/10   read more
+ Fraud case will continue against asbestos firm - 5/8   read more
+ Calif. court affirms asbestos award, calls company 'reprehensible... - 5/2   read more
+ Second Circuit: Pfizer lost protection against asbestos suits - 4/19   read more
+ CSX given discovery orders in racketeering case against firm - 4/19   read more
+ Bipartisan bill would bring change to asbestos lawsuits - 4/18   read more
+ CSX needs more depositions in fraud case against asbestos firm - 4/10   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
livermore.jpg
Monday, May 21, 2012
NEW YORK (Legal Newsline) - A think tank affiliated with New York University School of Law has issued a report that "takes aim at the confusing debate over jobs and environmental regulation."
Read more...


+ Controversial presentation on creating 'legacy lawsuits' uncovered - 5/11
+ Defendants mount arguments for keeping Colossus in federal court - 5/8
+ Alaska AG says EPA's actions 'unlawful' - 4/30
+ U.S. SC won't take on torture case against Chevron - 4/27
+ Judge in Ark. Colossus class action did not 'play' - 4/25
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.