LegalNewsLine Logo  
Wednesday, May 23 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Seventh Circuit slams door on shareholder lawsuit against Zimmer
+ Mich. SC justice under scrutiny for real estate transactions
+ Verizon employee settles with employer, union
+ SEC charges N.J. man with real estate investment scam
+ NYU report: Environmental jobs claims often made 'out of context'
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Labor Issues
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
U.S. District Court 
story date  
Fosomax case transferred to N.J. federal court
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline) -- The U.S. Judicial Panel for Multi District Litigation has transferred a case about the prescription drug Fosomax.

The case of Thomas-Walsh et al. v. Merck & Co. has been moved to U.S. District Court in New Jersey. This vacates the order transferring the case to Colorado.

"After considering all argument of counsel, we find that the conditionally separated and remanded claims involve common questions of fact with claims in actions previously centralized in MDL No. 2243, and that transfer of Thomas-Walsh, in its entirety, to the District of New Jersey for inclusion in the centralized proceedings will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation," the panel wrote.

The panel believed that while most of the presently centralized litigation involves the use of Fosamax or its generic equivalent alone in the cause of femur fractures or similar bone injuries, at least five plaintiffs in the centralized actions allege that they suffered femur fractures by using either Fosamax and Reclast or Fosamax and Boniva. These five actions are similar to Thomas-Walsh.

According to the ruling, "Because issues concerning whether Fosamax and Boniva or Fosamax and Reclast cause femur fractures are already before the transferee court, we conclude that transfer of all claims in Thomas-Walsh is warranted."

Filed Under: U.S. District Court

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Seventh Circuit sides with Ill. governor on pay raises - 5/22   read more
+ Suit over soda's formula points to problems in W.Va. legal system - 5/17   read more
+ Verizon employee settles with employer, union - 5/17   read more
+ Federal judge refuses to dismiss Chevron RICO lawsuit - 5/16   read more
+ Fourth Circuit rules for Time Warner in dispute with MASN - 5/16   read more
+ Seventh Circuit: Bill collector can be sued for calls to wrong nu... - 5/15   read more
+ Sixth Circuit: Other companies can be held liable in beam acciden... - 5/15   read more
+ Second Circuit rules against NLRB in Starbucks case - 5/14   read more
+ Two stock promoters, trader and lawyer sentenced in scheme - 5/14   read more
+ Three N.Y. union leaders guilty of racketeering, extortion - 5/14   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
livermore.jpg
Monday, May 21, 2012
NEW YORK (Legal Newsline) - A think tank affiliated with New York University School of Law has issued a report that "takes aim at the confusing debate over jobs and environmental regulation."
Read more...


+ Controversial presentation on creating 'legacy lawsuits' uncovered - 5/11
+ Defendants mount arguments for keeping Colossus in federal court - 5/8
+ Alaska AG says EPA's actions 'unlawful' - 4/30
+ U.S. SC won't take on torture case against Chevron - 4/27
+ Judge in Ark. Colossus class action did not 'play' - 4/25
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.