LegalNewsLine Logo  
Wednesday, May 23 2012 Twitter  feedburner  yahoo  Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
clear
clear
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
Today's Offers:

LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Seventh Circuit slams door on shareholder lawsuit against Zimmer
+ Mich. SC justice under scrutiny for real estate transactions
+ Verizon employee settles with employer, union
+ SEC charges N.J. man with real estate investment scam
+ NYU report: Environmental jobs claims often made 'out of context'
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ BP Oil Spill
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Federal Government
+ Financial Crisis
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Labor Issues
+ Lead Paint
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
U.S. Supreme Court 
story date  
Bill to televise U.S. SC passes committee
roberts.jpg
Chief Justice John Roberts
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline) - The Senate Judiciary Committee has voted in favor of allowing cameras into the U.S. Supreme Court.

In an 11-7 vote Thursday, the committee approved Senate Bill 1945, introduced by a bipartisan group in December. The bill still requires approval by both houses of Congress.

"The Supreme Court shall permit television coverage of all open sessions of the court unless the court decides, by a majority of justices, that allowing such coverage in a particular case would constitute a violation of the due process rights of one or more of the parties before the court," the bill says.

The bill was sponsored by Republicans Charles Grassley of Iowa and John Cornyn of Texas. Democrats sponsoring the bill were Dick Durbin of Illinois, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Charles Schumer of New York and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut.

In an editorial that was published on CNN.com, Northwestern University journalism professor Joe Mathewson wrote that it is time to put cameras in the courtroom.

"(T)he Supreme Court, despite numerous requests and even proposed congressional action extending over several decades, has never permitted television," he wrote. "The justices fear the presence of cameras would tarnish the court's dignified proceedings.

"But bear in mind that the Supreme Court doesn't try cases, so there's no danger of uncorking sensational trials like those of O.J. Simpson, Casey Anthony or Michael Jackson's doctor. That's not the issue."

Mathewson wrote that two-thirds of the state supreme courts in the country allow cameras, as do two federal appellate courts.

Many are interested in viewing the coming health care debate that the court will hear in March. C-SPAN has asked the court for permission to broadcast arguments, Mathewson said.

Being debated is a mandate in President Barack Obama's health care reform that requires individuals to purchase health insurance or face a yearly penalty of $695. Twenty-six states say the mandate is unconstitutional, and the remainder of the law cannot stand without it.

From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at jobrienwv@gmail.com.

Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Group of states file brief to U.S. SC to uphold Mont. election la... - 5/21   read more
+ Mont. AG's brief to U.S. SC over election law due - 5/18   read more
+ U.S. SC denies challenge to New York City's rent control law - 4/24   read more
+ U.S. SC: Outside lawyers entitled to immunity for government work - 4/17   read more
+ U.S. SC won't hear Skilling case again - 4/17   read more
+ U.S. SC to decide if drug reps can receive overtime pay - 4/11   read more
+ Corporations fighting Mont. election law file petition with U.S. ... - 3/30   read more
+ U.S. SC asks if ObamaCare can work without mandate - 3/28   read more
+ W.Va. officials say redistricting ruling worth U.S. SC review - 3/28   read more
+ Justice Kennedy's statements analyzed after health care arguments - 3/27   read more


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
livermore.jpg
Monday, May 21, 2012
NEW YORK (Legal Newsline) - A think tank affiliated with New York University School of Law has issued a report that "takes aim at the confusing debate over jobs and environmental regulation."
Read more...


+ Controversial presentation on creating 'legacy lawsuits' uncovered - 5/11
+ Defendants mount arguments for keeping Colossus in federal court - 5/8
+ Alaska AG says EPA's actions 'unlawful' - 4/30
+ U.S. SC won't take on torture case against Chevron - 4/27
+ Judge in Ark. Colossus class action did not 'play' - 4/25
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.